首页> 外文期刊>Advances in therapy. >A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Study of Glycopyrrolate/Formoterol Fumarate Metered Dose Inhaler Relative to Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Dry Powder Inhaler in COPD
【24h】

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Study of Glycopyrrolate/Formoterol Fumarate Metered Dose Inhaler Relative to Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Dry Powder Inhaler in COPD

机译:相对于Umeclidinium / Vilantolol干粉吸入器的随机,双盲,甲蛋白酶富马酸富马酸富马酸富马酸莫含量吸入器中的随机,双盲,双伪静脉注入液

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction Glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate metered dose inhaler (GFF MDI), formulated using co-suspension delivery technology, is the only approved fixed-dose combination long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting beta(2)-agonist (LAMA/LABA) delivered via MDI. Direct comparisons of GFF MDI versus other LAMA/LABAs have not previously been performed. We assessed the efficacy and safety of GFF MDI relative to umeclidinium/vilanterol dry powder inhaler (UV DPI) in patients with moderate-to-very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods In this phase IIIb randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, 24-week study, patients received GFF MDI 18/9.6 mu g (equivalent to glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate 14.4/10 mu g; two inhalations per dose, twice-daily; n = 559) or UV DPI 62.5/25 mu g (one inhalation, once-daily; n = 560). Primary endpoints were change from baseline in morning pre-dose trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and peak change from baseline in FEV1 within 2 h post-dose, both over 24 weeks. Additional lung function, symptom and safety endpoints were also assessed. Results For the primary endpoints, GFF MDI was non-inferior to UV DPI (using a margin of - 50 mL) for peak FEV1 (least squares mean [LSM] difference - 3.4 mL, 97.5% confidence interval [CI] - 32.8, 25.9) but not for trough FEV1 (LSM difference - 87.2 mL; - 117.0, - 57.4). GFF MDI was nominally superior to UV DPI for onset of action (p < 0.0001) and was nominally non-inferior to UV DPI for all symptom endpoints (Transition Dyspnea Index focal score, Early Morning/Night-Time Symptoms COPD instrument scores, and COPD Assessment Test score). Exacerbation and safety findings were similar between groups. Conclusions Over 24 weeks of treatment, GFF MDI was non-inferior to UV DPI for peak FEV1, but not for morning pre-dose trough FEV1. GFF MDI had a faster onset of action versus UV DPI. There were no clinically meaningful differences between treatments in symptom endpoints. Both treatments were well tolerated with similar safety profiles. Funding AstraZeneca
机译:使用共悬浮递送技术制定的甘油吡咯醇/福莫特罗富马酸富马特计量吸入器(GFF MDI)是唯一经过批准的固定剂量组合长效毒蕈族拮抗剂/长效β(2) - 代表(LAMA / LABA)通过MDI。以前未执行GFF MDI与其他LAMA / Labas的直接比较。我们评估了GFF MDI相对于中度至关重要的慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者的UMECLIDINIUM / VILANTEROL干粉吸入器(UV DPI)的疗效和安全性。方法在该阶段IIIB随机,双盲,双伪,多中心,24周的研究,患者接受GFF MDI 18 /9.6μg(相当于甘油酮/福莫特罗富马酸二水合物14.4 /10μg;每剂量两次吸入,每日两次; n = 559)或UV DPI 62.5 / 25 mu g(一次吸入,每日一次; n = 560)。主要终点在1 s(FEV1)中的早晨呼气量的基线中从基线发生变化,并在24小时内从2小时后的FEV1中的基线的峰值变化。还评估了额外的肺功能,症状和安全终点。初级终点的结果,GFF MDI对UV DPI(使用 - 50mL的裕度)进行峰FEV1(最小二乘意味着[LSM]差异 - 3.4mL,97.5%置信区间[CI] - 32.8,25.9 )但不适用于槽FEV1(LSM差异 - 87.2 mL; - 117.0, - 57.4)。 GFF MDI名义上优于紫外线DPI,用于暂停动作(P <0.0001),并且名义上是对所有症状终点的UV DPI(过渡呼吸困难指数焦点评分,清晨/夜间症状COPD仪器分数,以及COPD评估测试得分)。群体之间的恶化和安全结果相似。结论治疗超过24周,GFF MDI对UV DPI的峰值FEV1是不逊色的,但不是用于早晨的预剂量槽FEV1。 GFF MDI对UV DPI具有更快的动作开始。症状终点的治疗之间没有临床上有意义的差异。两种治疗均具有相似的安全性型材耐受。资助Astrazeneca.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号