...
【24h】

Using cover crops in headlands of organic grain farms: Effects on soil properties, weeds and crop yields

机译:在有机谷物农场岬角中使用封面作物:对土壤性质,杂草和作物产量的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Organic producers often rely heavily on tillage for weed management, which can create compaction, especially in headlands, and favor weed growth. To address Illinois organic grain farmers' concerns, we explored the effect of cover crops in headland areas of their farms on soil properties, weeds, and yields in a participatory on-farm approach. A split-plot arrangement with two replications at each of four Illinois locations was used in two consecutive years within field areas [FA: headlands - or turn-rows - HL; non-headlands NHL] randomly selected as main plots where four cover crop treatments were randomly assigned (CC: fallow control C; forage radish FR; mix of forage radish and buckwheat FRbw; and mix of forage radish with hairy vetch and cereal rye FRhvr). Collaborating farmers planted soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] in 2012 and corn (Zea mays L.) in 2013. Each fall and spring, we measured soil penetration resistance (PR), bulk density (BD), water aggregate stability (WAS), total carbon (TC), nitrate (N-NO3), ammonium (N-NH4), available phosphorus (P), and pH. Additionally, cover crop and weed growth, and cash crop yields were determined each year. Our results indicate HL areas had greater PR (+22%) and BD (+3%), as well as higher WAS (+4%), IC (+10%), P (+36%), and pH,(+7%) in comparison to NHL areas on average through the fall and spring seasons. Though FRhvr significantly reduced spring weed biomass (-30%) compared to the controls, higher density of grass weeds (+44%) were present in HL areas through spring and summer regardless of CC treatments. Due to the resilient nature of these particular Illinois soils and extreme weather pattern observations, the cover crop treatments did not alleviate compaction nor influence soil properties for the duration of this project. However, there was a trend toward lower available P in the FRhvr treatments and reduced crop yields in those treatments within the NHL areas. Though the cover crop treatments chosen for this trial did not seem to provide clear benefits, our results point toward a beneficial feedback between the weed community and the soil properties within headland areas in these organic systems. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:有机生产商常常严重依赖于杂草管理的耕作,这可以造成压实,特别是在岬角,并有利于杂草增长。为了解决伊利诺伊州有机粮食农民的担忧,我们探讨了封面作物在农场地区土壤属性,杂草和饲养场的岬角地区的疗效作用。在田间区域连续两年中使用了两个伊利诺伊州地区中的每一个的两个复制的分裂绘图布置[Fa:岬角 - 或转弯 - HL;非岬角NHL]随机选择作为主块,其中四个覆盖作物处理被随机分配(CC:休耕控制C;饲料萝卜FR;饲料萝卜和荞麦FRBW的混合;与毛茸茸的萝卜和谷物Rye Frhvr混合饲料萝卜) 。合作农民种植大豆[Glycine Max(L.)Merr。] 2012年和玉米(Zea Mays L.)2013年。每个秋季和弹簧,我们测量了土壤渗透性(PR),散装密度(BD),水合稳定性(是),总碳(TC),硝酸盐(N-NO 3),铵(N-NH4),可用磷(P)和pH。此外,每年涵盖作物和杂草生长,以及现金作物产量。我们的结果表明HL区域具有更高的PR(+ 22%)和BD(+ 3%),较高(+ 4%),IC(+ 10%),P(+ 36%)和pH( + 7%)与NHL区域平均通过秋季和春季。虽然FRHVR显着降低了春季杂草生物量(-30%)与对照相比,但无论CC治疗如何,HL区域都存在高密度的草杂草(+ 44%)。由于这些特殊伊利诺伊州土壤和极端天气模式观测的弹性性质,覆盖作物治疗并未缓解压实,而不会影响该项目的持续时间。然而,在FRHVR治疗中可用的可用P趋势,并减少了NHL区域内的那些治疗中的作物产量。虽然为该试验选择的覆盖作物治疗似乎没有提供明显的益处,但我们的结果指出了杂草群落与这些有机系统中岬角区域内的土壤性质之间有益的反馈。 (c)2015 Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号