...
首页> 外文期刊>Agriculture and Human Values >Food poverty, food waste and the consensus frame on charitable food redistribution in Italy
【24h】

Food poverty, food waste and the consensus frame on charitable food redistribution in Italy

机译:粮食贫困,食品废物和意大利慈善食品再分配的共识框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Food poverty and food waste are two major contemporary food system problems, which have (re)gained prominence amongst both scholars and policy-makers, due to recent economic and environmental concerns. In this context, the culturally dominant perspective portrays charitable food redistribution as a "win-win solution" to confront food poverty and food waste in affluent societies, although this view is contested by many scholars. This paper applies the notions of framings and flat/sharp keyings to unpack the different narratives entailed by public discourses on food waste and food poverty in Italy. The aim is to problematize the representation of the recent anti-waste/pro-donations law as the optimal policy measure to effectively rectify both food poverty and food waste. The paper argues that the widespread public support for the law reflects the interpretation of charitable food redistribution as a consensus frame, standing for the convergence between flat positions and is reinforced by confusion on terms and responsibilities. Indeed, the strength of the law lies in the capacity to reconcile different positions and bring actors together around a short-term objective, whose foundations have deep roots in the common ethics. However, if the debate is to be moved forward, trade-offs between different framings of problems at stake should be explicitly navigated when designing policy instruments.
机译:粮食贫困和食品废物是两大的当代食品系统问题,由于近期经济和环境问题,他们在学者和政策制定者之间获得了(重新)的突出。在这种情况下,文化主导的观点将慈善的食物再分配描绘成“双赢解决”,以在富裕的社会中面对粮食贫困和食物垃圾,尽管这一观点是由许多学者争论的。本文适用于框架的概念和平坦/尖锐的键,以解压缩不同叙事,这些叙述在意大利食品垃圾和食品贫困上的公共话语所需的不同叙述。目的是解决最近的抗废物/职业捐助法作为最佳政策措施,以有效纠正食品贫困和食物垃圾的最佳政策措施。本文认为,对法律的广泛公开支持反映了慈善食品再分配作为共识框架的解释,占平面职位之间的融合,并通过对术语和责任的困惑加强。实际上,法律的力量依赖于调和不同职位的能力,并在短期目标周围将演员携带,其基金会在共同的道德中具有深厚的根源。但是,如果辩论将被转发,应在设计政策工具时明确导航不同框架之间的不同框架之间的权衡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号