首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural and Forest Meteorology >Comparison of GLUE and DREAM for the estimation of cultivar parameters in the APSIM-maize model
【24h】

Comparison of GLUE and DREAM for the estimation of cultivar parameters in the APSIM-maize model

机译:APSIM-MAIZ模型中栽培品种参数估计的胶水和梦想的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Process-based crop models are popular scientific tools to study the impacts of environmental conditions and management decisions on crop growth. Some cultivar parameters in crop models cannot be measured directly and need to be estimated. In this research, two most popular Bayesian methods, namely generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) and Differential Evolution Adaptive Metropolis (DREAM), were used for the first time to estimate parameters of the maize module of the Agricultural Productions Systems sIMulator model (APSIM-maize). Both theoretical and real-world evaluations were conducted to compare the performances of these two methods. The maize yields from 2003 to 2006 were used for model calibration, and the yields from 2007 to 2013 were used for model validation. Both GLUE and DREAM performed well in the theoretical and real-world evaluation. During the validation period (2007-2013), when the heteroscedastic model error assumption was adopted in DREAM, on average approximate 90% of observed yield values were captured in the 95% confidence band of DREAM (P-factor= 90.47%), which was larger than that using GLUE (P-factor= 80.93%). Meanwhile the uncertainty bands of DREAM (R-factor= 4.42) were wider than those of GLUE (R-factor= 2.32). If only one parameter set was allowed to be used in the simulation, the weighted mean parameter values according to the likelihood of each parameter set performed better than the parameter set with maximum likelihoods for GLUE while the opposite is true for DREAM. But considering future analysis in the real-world evaluation, the moderate performance of these two methods suggests that a single parameter set obtained by neither GLUE nor DREAM is satisfactory and ensemble simulation is needed. Overall, GLUE and DREAM had similar performance, but GLUE is more convenient and simpler to use than DREAM. So we think GLUE is a better choice than DREAM for estimating cultivar parameters of APSIM-maize.
机译:基于过程的作物模型是研究环境条件和管理决策对作物生长的影响的热门科学工具。在作物模型中的一些品种参数不能直接测量,需要估计。在这项研究中,两个最受欢迎的贝叶斯方法,即广义似然不确定性估计(胶水)和差分演进自适应大都会(梦想)首次用于估计农业生产系统模拟器模型的玉米模块的参数(APSIM-玉米)。进行了理论和现实世界评估,以比较这两种方法的表现。 2003年至2006年的玉米产量用于模型校准,2007年至2013年的产量用于模型验证。胶水和梦想在理论和真实的评估中表现良好。在验证期间(2007-2013)期间,当在梦中采用异源型模型错误假设时,平均近似90%的观察产量值被捕获在梦中的95%的置信带(p-factor = 90.47%)中捕获比使用胶水(p-factor = 80.93%)大。同时,梦想的不确定性条带(R-Factor = 4.42)比胶水(R-TACES = 2.32)宽。如果在模拟中仅允许一个参数集来使用一个参数集,则根据每个参数集的可能性的加权平均参数值比参数集更好地执行,其中粘合的最大似然性,而相反的是梦想。但考虑到在真实世界评估中的未来分析,这两种方法的中等性能表明,所获得的单个参数集既不是胶水也不是令人满意的,需要集成仿真。总的来说,胶水和梦想具有类似的性能,但胶水比梦想更方便,更简单。因此,我们认为胶水是估计APSIM-MAIZE的品种参数的梦想更好的选择。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Agricultural and Forest Meteorology》 |2019年第2019期|共14页
  • 作者单位

    Nanjing Normal Univ Minist Educ Key Lab Virtual Geog Environm Nanjing Jiangsu Peoples R China;

    Nanjing Normal Univ Minist Educ Key Lab Virtual Geog Environm Nanjing Jiangsu Peoples R China;

    Nanjing Normal Univ Minist Educ Key Lab Virtual Geog Environm Nanjing Jiangsu Peoples R China;

    Nanjing Normal Univ Minist Educ Key Lab Virtual Geog Environm Nanjing Jiangsu Peoples R China;

    Nanjing Normal Univ Minist Educ Key Lab Virtual Geog Environm Nanjing Jiangsu Peoples R China;

    Nanjing Normal Univ Minist Educ Key Lab Virtual Geog Environm Nanjing Jiangsu Peoples R China;

    Nanjing Normal Univ Minist Educ Key Lab Virtual Geog Environm Nanjing Jiangsu Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 农业基础科学;
  • 关键词

    APSIM-maize; GLUE; DREAM; Crop growth; Uncertainty analysis;

    机译:APSIM-MAIZE;胶水;梦想;作物增长;不确定性分析;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号