首页> 外文期刊>Critical reviews in toxicology >A 1-year toxicity study in dogs is no longer a scientifically justifiable core data requirement for the safety assessment of pesticides.
【24h】

A 1-year toxicity study in dogs is no longer a scientifically justifiable core data requirement for the safety assessment of pesticides.

机译:狗的1年毒性研究不再是对农药安全评估的科学合理的核心数据要求。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A review of publications on pesticides assessing the need for 1-year toxicity studies in dogs was performed. Four key peer-reviewed papers with different approaches investigated the value of a 1-year dog study in addition to a 3-month study. Despite different databases and approaches, each concluded with the recommendation to limit the testing of pesticides in dogs to a duration of 3 months. The combined weight of evidence presented in this review reinforces these independent conclusions. Therefore, the routine inclusion of a 1-year dog study as a mandated regulatory requirement for the safety assessment of pesticides is no longer justifiable and a globally harmonized approach should be taken to match the latest legislation of the European Union and the US EPA.
机译:对杀虫剂的出版物进行了评估,评估了在狗犬毒性研究的需要。 除了3个月的研究外,还研究了不同方法的四个关键同行评审纸,还研究了一岁犬研究的价值。 尽管数据库和方法不同,但每个建议都结束了限制狗的农药测试到3个月的持续时间。 本综述中提出的综合证据的重量强化了这些独立的结论。 因此,一年狗研究作为授权评估安全评估的授权监管要求的常规包含不再是合理的,并应采取全球统一的方法来匹配欧盟和美国EPA的最新立法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号