...
首页> 外文期刊>Aesthetic plastic surgery >Impact of Lipo-Body Lift Compared to Classical Lower Body Lift on Postoperative Outcome and Patient's Satisfaction: A Retrospective Study
【24h】

Impact of Lipo-Body Lift Compared to Classical Lower Body Lift on Postoperative Outcome and Patient's Satisfaction: A Retrospective Study

机译:脂肪体提升对术后结果和患者满意度的古典下半身升力相比:回顾性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction Lately, the growing number of bariatric procedures performed each year led to an increasing demand for lower trunk reconstruction. Our team previously described the lipo-body lift (LBL) technique into lower duration of drainage and therefore seromas and other complications. In this study, we compared the classical body lift (CBL) technique to the LBL procedure. Materials and Methods All patients who underwent a LBL or CBL after massive weight loss between November 2012 and October 2017 were included. Surgery outcome parameters were collected as well as patient satisfaction through a satisfaction score realized at least after 1 year postoperative. Comparisons between CBL and LBL were conducted to assess the surgery's safety and the patient's satisfaction. Results A total of 130 patients were included, 61 patients who had a LBL were compared to 69 patients who had a CBL. The mean patient age was 39.64 +/- 9.97 (21-66) years old, the mean body mass index before plastic surgery was 26.83 +/- 3.08 kg/m(2) (19.83-32.69), and the average weight loss was 53.40 +/- 17.37 kg. The two groups had comparable preoperative data. Duration of drainage and hospital stay was significantly lower in the LBL group than in the CBL (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Surgical outcomes were comparable between groups as well as patient satisfaction scores. Conclusion Lipo-body lift allows early discharge of the patient by reducing the duration of drainage without increasing the risk for complications. In our opinion, this technique should be used for type 1 and 2 patients with no contraindication for abdominal liposuction.
机译:介绍最近,每年进行的肥胖症越来越多的肥胖症程序导致较低的躯干重建需求不断增加。我们的团队以前将Lipo-Body Lift(LBL)技术描述为较低的排水持续时间,因此是血清瘤和其他并发症。在这项研究中,我们将经典的身体提升(CBL)技术与LBL程序进行了比较。包括材料和方法在2012年11月至2017年11月间大规模减肥后造成LBL或CBL的所有患者。通过在术后1年后至少在1年后实现的满足评分来收集手术结果参数以及患者满意度。进行CBL和LBL之间的比较,以评估手术的安全性和患者的满意度。结果共有130名患者,61名患有LBL的患者与69名有CBL的患者进行比较。平均患者年龄为39.64 +/- 9.97(21-66)岁,整形手术前的平均体重指数为26.83 +/- 3.08 kg / m(2)(19.83-32.69),平均减肥是53.40 +/- 17.37千克。两组具有可比的术前数据。 LBL组排水持续时间显着低于CBL(分别为CBL(P <0.0001和P <0.0001)。手术结果与群体之间以及患者满意度分数相当。结论Lipo-Body Lift允许通过降低排水的持续时间来提高患者而不增加并发症的风险。在我们看来,该技术应用于1型和2名没有腹部吸脂的禁忌症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号