首页> 外文期刊>Aesthetic plastic surgery >Online and Social Media Footprint of All Swedish Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons
【24h】

Online and Social Media Footprint of All Swedish Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons

机译:所有瑞典美学整形外科医生的在线和社交媒体足迹

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background The visual nature of the Internet and its newer technologies makes it naturally aligned to plastic and aesthetic surgery. While many studies have looked at the use of social media ('SoMe'), they have been limited by either low response rate or limited scope. Our aim was to analyse a whole community of aesthetic plastic surgeons and their use of the Internet and social media platforms over a period of many years. Methods All active members of the Swedish national aesthetic plastic surgery society were identified. Webpages, professional (LinkedIn), social media (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram) and video-sharing (YouTube) accounts as well as online patient forum (Plastikoperationsforum) mentions of the surgeons and their clinics were identified, and corresponding platform-specific metrics were analysed. Results Of the 85 active members, 67 (78.9%) had a webpage on one of the 34 different clinic websites. The websites of older established clinics had a significantly better Alexa ranking than newer ones. Surgeons with a profile on Facebook or Instagram were significantly younger than those without an account. Twitter was the least preferred social media platform. Each surgeon had a mean 12.8 threads per year as compared to a mean 34.3 threads per clinic per year. Conclusion Most of the new practices established by Swedish aesthetic plastic surgeons in the last 10 years are single-surgeon ones. Instagram and Facebook accounts of their clinics seem to be the most popular SoMe platforms. Younger surgeons were more likely to have a Facebook or Instagram account and to be using two or more social media platforms. These data provide information about all aesthetic plastic surgeons registered with the Swedish national body and their increasing use of SoMe. Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
机译:背景技术互联网及其更新技术的视觉性质使其自然与塑料和美学手术保持一致。虽然许多研究已经看过使用社交媒体(“某些”),但它们受到低响应率或范围有限的限制。我们的目标是在多年来一段时间内分析审美整体外科医生的整个社区及其使用互联网和社交媒体平台。方法确定了瑞典国家美学整形外科学会的所有活跃成员。网页,专业(LinkedIn),社交媒体(Facebook,Twitter,Instagram)和视频共享(YouTube)账户以及在线患者论坛(Plastikoperationsforum)的外科医生提到和其诊所的提到,以及相应的平台特定度量分析。 85个活跃成员的结果67(78.9%)在34个不同的诊所网站中的一家网页上有一个网页。较老的诊所的网站具有比较新的山脉排名更好。与Facebook或Instagram上的简介的外科医生比没有账户的内容很小。 Twitter是最不首选的社交媒体平台。与每年诊所的平均34.3线程相比,每个外科医生每年有平均12.8个线程。结论瑞典美学塑料外科医生在过去10年中建立的大多数新做法是单外科医生。 Instagram和Facebook的诊所似乎是最受欢迎的一些平台。年轻的外科医生更有可能拥有Facebook或Instagram帐户,并使用两个或更多社交媒体平台。这些数据提供了有关在瑞典民族机构注册的所有美学整形外科医生的信息及其日益增长的一些。证据v本期刊要求提交人向每篇文章分配一定程度的证据。有关这些基于证据的药物评级的完整描述,请参阅内容表或在线指示给作者www.springer.com/00266。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号