首页> 外文期刊>Addictive behaviors >An electronic, smart lighter to measure cigarette smoking: A pilot study to assess feasibility and initial validity
【24h】

An electronic, smart lighter to measure cigarette smoking: A pilot study to assess feasibility and initial validity

机译:一种电子,智能打火机来测量吸烟:试点研究,以评估可行性和初始有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Understanding variability in smoking patterns may inform smoking cessation interventions. Retrospective reports of cigarettes smoked per day may be biased and typically do not provide temporal precision regarding when cigarettes are smoked. However, real-time, user-initiated tracking, such as logging each time a cigarette is smoked, can be burdensome over long time frames. In this study, adult, non-treatment seeking daily smokers (N = 22) used an electronic, smart lighter to light and timestamp cigarettes for 14 days. Participants reported number of cigarettes smoked per day (CPD) via a mobile device (daily diary) and retrospectively reported CPD at the end of the study using the Timeline Followback (TLFB). Self-reported lighter satisfaction and adherence varied with 68% of participants reporting that they liked using the lighter and participants reporting using the lighter for 92% of cigarettes smoked, on average. Lighter-estimated CPD did not differ from daily diary-estimated CPD, but was significantly lower than TLFB estimates. The lighter resulted in greater day-to-day variability relative to other methods and fewer rounded cigarette counts (digit bias) relative to the TLFB. The lighter appears to be feasible for capturing data on smoking patterns in daily smokers. Though false positive cigarettes are likely low, additional technologies that augment data captured from the lighter may be necessary to reduce false negatives (missed cigarettes) and alternative lighter designs may appeal more to certain smokers.
机译:了解吸烟模式的可变性可能会通知吸烟停止干预措施。每天吸烟的卷烟的回顾性可能被偏见,并且通常不会在烟烟烟雾时提供时间精确度。但是,实时,用户启动的跟踪,例如每次抽烟时记录,都可以在长时间框架中繁重。在这项研究中,成人,非治疗寻找每日吸烟者(n = 22)使用电子,智能较轻,光线和时间戳卷烟14天。参与者报告每天烟的数量(CPD)通过移动设备(每日日记),并在研究结束时使用时间线跟踪(TLFB)回顾性地报告CPD。自我报告的更轻的满足感和遵守各种各样的参与者,报告称他们使用较轻和参与者在使用较轻的报告中使用较轻的报告,平均使用令人沮丧的92%的香烟。较轻估计的CPD与日记日记估计的CPD没有差异,但显着低于TLFB估算。相对于其他方法和相对于TLFB的圆形卷烟计数(数字偏置),较浅的日常变异性导致更大的日常变异性。打火机似乎是可行的,可以在日常吸烟者中捕获关于吸烟模式的数据。虽然假卷的卷烟很低,但额外的技术可能需要增加从打火机捕获的数据来减少假底(错过的卷烟),并且替代较轻的设计可能对某些吸烟者吸引更多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号