...
首页> 外文期刊>Central European journal of operations research: CEJOR >Modified indices of political power: a case study of a few parliaments
【24h】

Modified indices of political power: a case study of a few parliaments

机译:改进的政治权力指数 - 对几个议会的案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

According to yes–no voting systems, players (e.g., parties in a parliament) have some influence on making some decisions. In formal voting situations, taking into account that a majority vote is needed for making a decision, the question of political power of parties can be considered. There are some well-known indices of political power e.g., the Shapley–Shubik index, the Banzhaf index, the Johnston index, the Deegan–Packel index. In order to take into account different political nature of the parties, as the main factor for forming a winning coalition i.e., a parliamentary majority, we give a modification of the power indices. For the purpose of comparison of these indices of political power from the empirical point of view, we consider the indices of power in some cases, i.e., in relation to a few parliaments.
机译:据是 - 没有投票制度,玩家(例如,议会中的缔约方)对做出一些决定有一些影响。 在正式的投票情况下,考虑到决定需要多数票,可以考虑各方的政治权力问题。 有一些知名的政治力量指数,例如,福糖指数,约翰斯顿指数,Deegan-Packel指数,Shapley-Shubik指数。 为了考虑各方的不同政治性质,作为形成胜利联盟的主要因素,即议会多数,我们提供了对电力指标的修改。 为了比较这些政治权力指数从经验的角度来看,我们考虑在某些情况下的权力指数,即与几个议会相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号