首页> 外文期刊>Advanced Science Letters >Comparative Study of Adaptive Elitism and Mutation Operators in Flower Pollination Algorithm for Combinatorial Testing Problem
【24h】

Comparative Study of Adaptive Elitism and Mutation Operators in Flower Pollination Algorithm for Combinatorial Testing Problem

机译:组合检测问题的花授粉算法中自适应精英算子的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The performance of meta-heuristic search algorithms highly depends on their intensification and diversification abilities. Different algorithms adopt intensification and diversification strategies in order to obtain better results. Elitism and mutation are common operators that areused for increasing the diversity of the population. Flower Pollination Algorithm (FPA) is one of the recent meta-heuristic algorithms for global optimization. Although proven to be efficient, FPA is prone to get stuck into a local optimum due to the weakness of its population’s diversityespecially for multimodal optimization problem. In this paper, first, we propose two strategies based on mutation-FPA (mFPA) and elitism-FPA (eFPA) for t -way test generation (t refer to interaction strength). Then, a comparison between mFPA and eFPA is studied to analysis theeffect of introducing elitism and mutation operators on FPA’s performance. The results of the experiments show that both of eFPA and mFPA strategies appear to produce better results than original FPA strategy, however, eFPA performs much better than mFPA in term of tests size.
机译:元启发式搜索算法的性能高度取决于它们的强化和多样化能力。不同的算法采用强化和多样化策略,以获得更好的结果。精英主义和突变是普通运营商,用于增加人口的多样性。花授粉算法(FPA)是最近全球优化的元启发式算法之一。虽然被证明是高效的,但由于其人口多数优化问题的多数组优惠的弱点,FPA易于陷入本地最佳状态。在本文中,首先,我们提出了一种基于突变-FPA(MFPA)和ELitism-FPA(EFPA)的两种策略,用于 T.TRAY试验生成( T,参考相互作用强度)。然后,研究了MFPA和EFPA之间的比较,以分析引入精才主义和突变运营商对FPA性能的影响。实验结果表明,EFPA和MFPA策略似乎都会产生比原始FPA策略更好的结果,但是,EFPA在测试规模的任期内比MFPA更好地表现得多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号