首页> 外文期刊>Acta Neurochirurgica >Current accuracy of surface matching compared to adhesive markers in patient-to-image registration
【24h】

Current accuracy of surface matching compared to adhesive markers in patient-to-image registration

机译:与患者到图像配准中的粘合标记相比,表面匹配的电流精度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

ObjectIn the past, the accuracy of surface matching has been shown to be disappointing. We aimed to determine whether this had improved over the years by assessing application accuracy of current navigation systems, using either surface matching or point-pair matching.MethodsEleven patients, scheduled for intracranial surgery, were included in this study after a power analysis had shown this small number to be sufficient. Prior to surgery, one additional fiducial marker was placed on the scalp, the target marker, where the entry point of surgery was to be expected. Using one of three different navigation systems, two patient-to-image registration procedures were performed: one based on surface matching and one based on point-pair matching. Each registration procedure was followed by the digitization of the target marker's location, allowing calculation of the target registration error. If the system offered surface matching improvement, this was always used; and for the two systems that routinely offer an estimate of neuronavigation accuracy, this was also recorded.ResultsThe error in localizing the target marker using point-pair matching or surface matching was respectively 2.49mm and 5.35mm, on average (p<0.001). In those four cases where an attempt was made to improve the surface matching, the error increased to 6.35mm, on average. For the seven cases where the system estimated accuracy, this estimate did not correlate with target registration error (R-2=0.04, p=0.67).ConclusionThe accuracy of navigation systems has not improved over the last decade, with surface matching consistently yielding errors that are twice as large as when point-pair matching with adhesive markers is used. These errors are not reliably reflected by the systems own prediction, when offered. These results are important to make an informed choice between image-to-patient registration strategies, depending on the type of surgery at hand.
机译:过去,表面匹配的准确性已被证明是令人失望的。我们旨在通过评估目前导航系统的应用准确性,使用表面匹配或点对匹配来确定这是否已经改善了..在该研究中纳入颅内手术的患者,在该研究中纳入这项方法少数就足够了。在手术前,将一个额外的基准标记物放在头皮上,该靶标记物,预期手术的入口点。使用三种不同的导航系统之一,执行了两个患者到图像登记过程:基于表面匹配和基于点对匹配的匹配。每个注册过程后跟目标标记的位置的数字化,允许计算目标登记误差。如果系统提供表面匹配的改进,则始终使用这一点;对于两种系统来说,通常提供神经元维避视觉精度的估计,还记录了使用点对匹配或表面匹配定位目标标记的误差分别为2.49mm和5.35mm(P <0.001)。在尝试改善表面匹配的四种情况下,平均误差增加到6.35毫米。对于系统估计准确性的七种情况下,该估计与目标登记误差没有相关(R-2 = 0.04,P = 0.67)。结论导航系统的准确性在过去十年中没有提高,表面匹配始终如一地产生误差这是与使用粘合标记的点对匹配时的两倍。在提供的系统中,这些错误并不可靠地反映系统自身预测。这些结果对于在图像到患者的登记策略之间做出明智的选择非常重要,这取决于手头的手术类型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号