首页> 外文期刊>Acta Neurochirurgica >Craniofacial resection of malignant tumors of the anterior skull base: a case series and a systematic review
【24h】

Craniofacial resection of malignant tumors of the anterior skull base: a case series and a systematic review

机译:颅骨颅骨颅面积的颅面切除:一个案例系列和系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BackgroundCraniofacial resection (CFR) is still considered as the gold standard for managing sinonasal malignancies of the anterior skull base (ASB), while endoscopic approaches are gaining credibility. The goal of this study was to evaluate outcomes of patients who underwent CFR at our institution and to compare our results to international literature.MethodRetrospective analysis of all patients undergoing CFR between 1995 and 2017, and systematic literature review according to the PRISMA statement.ResultsForty-one patients with sinonasal malignancy (81% with stage T4) of the ASB were included. There was no operative mortality. Complications were observed in 9 cases. We obtained 100% follow-up with mean observation of 100months. Disease-specific survival rates were 90%, 74%, and 62% and recurrence-free survival was 85% at two, 72% at five, and 10years follow-up, respectively. CFR as primary treatment, en bloc resection, and resection with negative margins correlated to better survival. Recursive partition analysis identified the latter as the most important prognostic factor, regardless of surgical technique. The relative risk of non-radicality was significantly higher after piecemeal resection compared to en bloc resection. Compared to 15 original articles, totaling 2603 patients, eligible for review, the present study has the longest follow-up time, the second highest 5-year OS, and the third highest 5-year DSS, despite having a higher proportion of patients with high-stage disease.ConclusionCFR in true en bloc fashion can still be considered as the treatment of choice in cases of advanced-stage sinonasal malignancies invading the ASB.
机译:BackgroundCraniocacial切除(CFR)仍被认为是管理前颅底(ASB)的Sinonasal恶性肿瘤的金标准,而内窥镜方法正在获得可信度。本研究的目标是评估在我们机构的CFR患者的患者的结果,并将我们的结果与国际文献进行比较。根据Prisma陈述,对所有患者进行了CFR的所有患者的含量分析。结果包括一个Sinonasal恶性肿瘤(81%的患者ASB的患者。没有手术死亡率。在9例中观察到并发症。我们获得了100%的随访,平均观察100个月。疾病特异性的存活率为90%,74%和62%,而自由存活率分别为85%,72%,分别为10年次随访。 CFR作为初级治疗,en Bloc切除,并与负边缘的切除相关,与更好的存活率相关。递归分区鉴定后者是最重要的预后因素,无论手术技术如何。与EN Bloc切除相比,零碎的切除后,非自由基的相对风险显着更高。与15篇原始文章相比,共有2603名患者,符合审查条件,目前的研究具有最长的随访时间,第二岁的时间最高,而第三年最高的5年DSS,尽管患者比例较高高阶段病。在真正的en Bloc时尚中常将被视为在入侵ASB的晚期Sinonasal Matignaal Matignasal Matignasal Matignasal的选择中的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号