首页> 外文期刊>Acta Neurochirurgica >How good are the outcomes of instrumented debulking operations for symptomatic spinal metastases and how long do they stand? A subgroup analysis in the global spine tumor study group database
【24h】

How good are the outcomes of instrumented debulking operations for symptomatic spinal metastases and how long do they stand? A subgroup analysis in the global spine tumor study group database

机译:对症状脊柱转移的仪表型消除作业的结果有多好,他们站立了多长时间? 全球脊柱肿瘤研究组数据库的亚组分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background The benefits of surgery for symptomatic spinal metastases have been demonstrated, largely based on series of patients undergoing debulking and instrumentation operations. However, as cancer treatments improve and overall survival lengths increase, the incidence of recurrent spinal cord compression after debulking may increase. The aim of the current paper is to document the postoperative evolution of neurological function, pain, and quality of life following debulking and instrumentation in the Global Spine Tumor Study Group (GSTSG) database. Methods The GSTSG database is a prospective multicenter data repository of consecutive patients that underwent surgery for a symptomatic spinal metastasis. For the present analysis, patients were selected from the database that underwent decompressive debulking surgery with instrumentation. Preoperative tumor type, Tomita and Tokuhashi scores, EQ-5D, Frankel, Karnofsky, and postoperative complications, survival, EQ-5D, Frankel, Karnofsky, and pain numeric rating scores (NRS) at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months were analyzed. Results A total of 914 patients underwent decompressive debulking surgery with instrumentation and had documented follow-up until death or until 2 years post surgery. Median preoperative Karnofsky performance index was 70. A total of 656 patients (71.8%) had visceral metastases and 490 (53.6%) had extraspinal bone metastases. Tomita scores were evenly distributed above (49.1%) and below or equal to 5 (50.9%), and Tokuhashi scores almost evenly distributed below or equal to 8 (46.3%) and above 8 (53.7%). Overall, 12-month survival after surgery was 56.3%. The surgery resulted in EQ-5D health status improvement and NRS pain reduction that was maintained throughout follow-up. Frankel scores improved at first follow-up in 25.0% of patients, but by 12 months neurological deterioration was observed in 18.8%. Conclusion We found that palliative debulking and instrumentation surgeries were performed throughout all Tomita and Tokuhashi categories. These surgeries reduced pain scores and improved quality of life up to 2 years after surgery. After initial improvement, a proportion of patients experienced neurological deterioration by 1 year, but the majority of patients remained stable.
机译:背景技术已经证明了对症状脊柱转移的益处,主要是基于经过验证和仪器操作的一系列患者。然而,随着癌症治疗的改善和整体存活长度增加,DeBulking后复发脊髓压缩的发生率可能会增加。目前文件的目的是记录在全球脊柱肿瘤研究组(GSTSG)数据库中的DeBulking和仪器后的神经功能,疼痛和生活质量的术后演变。方法GSTSG数据库是连续患者的前瞻性多中心数据储存库,接受症状脊髓转移的手术。对于目前的分析,患者选自患有用仪器进行解压缩的Debulking手术的数据库中选择。术前肿瘤类型,Tomita和Tokuhashi评分,EQ-5D,Frankel,Karnofsky和术后并发症,生存,EQ-5D,Frankel,Karnofsky和止痛数分数(NRS)在3,6,12和24个月内进行分析。结果共有914名患者接受了用仪器进行了减压抑制的脱水手术,并在手术后止血后记载了后续行动。中位数术前Karnofsky性能指数为70岁。共有656名患者(71.8%)具有内脏转移,490(53.6%)具有前壁转移。 Tomita评分以上(49.1%)和低于或等于5(50.9%),Tokuhashi分数几乎均匀分布在低于或等于8(46.3%)和8(53.7%)。总体而言,手术后的12个月生存率为56.3%。手术导致EQ-5D健康状况改善,并且在整个后续行动中维持的NRS疼痛减少。在25.0%的患者的第一次随访中,Frankel评分改善,但在12个月内观察到18.8%的神经系统恶化。结论我们发现在所有Tomita和Tokuhashi类别中进行了姑息性的Debulking和仪器手术。这些手术减少了疼痛评分,手术后2年的生活质量提高。初步改善后,一定数量的患者经历了1年的神经系统恶化,但大多数患者保持稳定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号