首页> 外文期刊>Acta Neurochirurgica >How is vasospasm screening using transcranial Doppler associated with delayed cerebral ischemia and outcomes in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage?
【24h】

How is vasospasm screening using transcranial Doppler associated with delayed cerebral ischemia and outcomes in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage?

机译:如何使用经颅多普勒与动脉瘤性蛛网膜瘤出血中延迟脑缺血和结果相关的血管痉挛筛查?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BackgroundDelayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is an independent predictor of an unfavorable outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Many centers, but not all, use transcranial Doppler (TCD) to screen for vasospasm to help predict DCI. We used the United Kingdom and Ireland Subarachnoid Haemorrhage (UKISAH) Registry to see if outcomes were better in centers that used TCD to identify vasospasm compared to those that did not.MethodsTCD screening practices were ascertained by national survey in 13 participating centers of the UKISAH. The routine use of TCD was reported by 5 screening centers, leaving 7 non-screening centers. Using a cross-sectional cohort study design, prospectively collected data from the UKISAH Registry was used to compare DCI diagnosis and favorable outcome (Glasgow Outcome Score 4 or 5) at discharge based on reported screening practice.ResultsA cohort of 2028 aSAH patients treated 3days of hemorrhage was analyzed. DCI was diagnosed in239/1065 (22.4%) and 220/963 (22.8%) of patients innon-screening and screening centers respectively while 847/1065 (79.5%) and 648/963 (67.2%) achieved a favorable outcome. Odds ratios adjusted for age, injury severity, comorbidities, need for cerebrospinal fluid diversion, and re-bleed returned neutral odds of diagnosing DCI of 0.90 (95% CI 0.72-1.12; p value=0.347) in screening units compared to those of non-screening units but significantly decreased odds of achieving a favorable outcome 0.56 (95% CI 0.42-0.82; p value 0.001).ConclusionsCenters that screened for vasospasm using TCD had poorer in-hospital outcomes and similar rates of DCI diagnosis compared to centers that did not.
机译:背景脑缺血(DCI)是动脉瘤蛛网膜瘤出血(ASAH)后不利的结果的独立预测因子。许多中心,但不是全部,使用经颅多普勒(TCD)来筛选血管痉挛,以帮助预测DCI。我们利用英国和爱尔兰蛛网膜下腔出血(UKISAH)登记处,看看使用TCD的中心是更好的,而不是那些没有通过Nutis的13个参与中心确定的筛选实践确定血管痉挛。 5个筛选中心报告了TCD的常规使用,留下7个非筛选中心。使用横断面队列研究设计,从乌斯兰登记处预期收集的数据用于基于报告的筛选实践,在出院时比较DCI诊断和有利的结果(Glasgow结果4或5).2028 asah患者的3天患者的群组队列分析出血。 DCI分别被诊断为239/1065(22.4%)和220/963名(22.8%)的患者Innon筛查和筛查中心,而847/1065(79.5%)和648/963(67.2%)取得了有利的结果。适应年龄,伤害严重程度,组合,脑脊液的差异,对脑脊液引进的需求进行调整,并且在筛选单位中再出血诊断DCI的中性可能性在筛选单位中诊断为0.90(95%CI 0.72-1.12; P值= 0.347)。与非-Screening单位但显着降低了实现有利的结果0.56(95%CI 0.42-0.82; P值<0.001)。使用TCD筛选用于血管痉挛的链接器,与中心相比,血管痉挛的血管痉挛较差和类似的DCI诊断速率较差那没有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号