首页> 外文期刊>Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis >Successful BCI communication via high-frequency SSVEP or visual, audio or tactile P300 in 30 tested volunteers
【24h】

Successful BCI communication via high-frequency SSVEP or visual, audio or tactile P300 in 30 tested volunteers

机译:通过高频SSVEP或视觉,音频或触觉P300成功的BCI通信在30个测试的志愿者中

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In the pursuit to clarify the concept of "BCI illiteracy", we investigated the possibilities of attaining basic binary (yes/no) communication via brain-computer interface (BCI). We tested four BCI paradigms: steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEP), tactile, visual, and auditory evoked potentials (P300). The proposed criterion for assessing for the possibility of communication are based on the number of correct choices obtained in a given BCI paradigm after a short calibration session, without prior training. In this study users answered 20 simple "yes/no" questions. Fourteen or more correct answers rejected the null hypothesis of random choices at P=0.05. All of the 30 healthy volunteers were able to attain above-chance choices in at least one of the four paradigms. Additionally, we tested the system in clinical settings on a patient recovering from disorders of consciousness, achieving successful communication in 2 out of 3 paradigms. In light of these facts, after a review of the sparse literature, and in the interest of motivating further research, we propose a paraphrase of de Finetti's provocative statement: "BCI illiteracy does not exist".
机译:在追求澄清“BCI文盲”的概念中,我们调查了通过脑电电脑接口(BCI)获得基本二元(是/否)通信的可能性。我们测试了四个BCI范式:稳态视觉诱发电位(SSVEP),触觉,视觉和诱发电位(P300)。拟议的用于评估通信可能性的标准基于在没有事先培训的短期校准会议之后在给定的BCI范例中获得的正确选择的数量。在本研究中,用户回答了20个简单的“是/否”问题。十四或更正确的答案拒绝在p = 0.05时拒绝随机选择的空假设。所有30名健康志愿者都能够在四个范式中的至少一个中获得上面的机会。此外,我们在从意识障碍中恢复的患者恢复的临床环境中测试了该系统,在3个范例中取得成功沟通。鉴于这些事实,在审查稀疏文献之后,令人兴奋的促进进一步研究,我们提出了一个德芬蒂蒂的挑衅性声明的解释:“BCI文盲不存在”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号