...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta parasitologica >Morphological, histological and molecular characterization of Myxobolus kingchowensis and Thelohanellus cf. sinensis infecting gibel carp Carassius auratus gibelio (Bloch, 1782)
【24h】

Morphological, histological and molecular characterization of Myxobolus kingchowensis and Thelohanellus cf. sinensis infecting gibel carp Carassius auratus gibelio (Bloch, 1782)

机译:Myxobolus Kingchowensis和Thelohanellus CF的形态学,组织学和分子表征 Sinensis感染吉布尔鲤鱼Carassius Auratus Gibelio(Bloch,1782)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A Myxobolus species and a Thelohanellus species infecting Carassius auratus gibelio (Bloch, 1782) were redescribed by their morphological, histological and molecular characterization. In the present study, the Myxobolus species infecting the muscle was identified as Myxobolus kingchowensis Chen et Ma, 1998 by the morphological and molecular data. Histologically, mature spores of M. kingchowensis were observed in the intercellular and connective tissue of muscle, though the plasmodia were not found. In addition, scattered spores also occurred in the intercellular of haematopoietic cells, intraepithelial of the renal tubules and interior of the melano-macrophage centres. Phylogenetic analysis showed that M. kingchowensis clustered in the clade of muscle-infecting Myxobolus species, further supporting muscle as the infection site of M. kingchowensis. The present Thelohanellus species infecting the gills was identified conspecific as Thelohanellus sinensis reported in Sun (2006) (mark it as T. sinensis-Sun) based on spore morphology, biological traits (host specificity and organ specificity), and molecular data. However, compared with the original description of T. sinensis Chen et Hsieh, 1960, the present Thelohanellus species and T. sinensis-Sun both infecting the gills of gibel carp are distinguishable from the original description in the host and infection site, which made the validity of T. sinensis-Sun dubious. Due to the absence of molecular data in the original description of T. sinensis, we suggest marking the present species and T. sinensis-Sun as T. cf. sinensis to avoid the confusion until T. sinensis is obtained from the type host and type infection site.
机译:通过它们的形态学,组织学和分子表征来重新筛分感染Carassius Auratus Gibelio(Bloch,1782)的骨胶醇物种和特洛赫勒斯物种。在本研究中,通过形态学和分子数据鉴定了感染肌肉感染肌肉的Myxobolus物种。组织学上,在肌肉的细胞间和结缔组织中观察到肌肉的成熟孢子,尽管未发现疟原虫。此外,散射孢子也发生在血吞噬细胞外细胞内,肾小管内肾小管和黑色巨噬细胞中心的内部。系统发育分析表明,M. Kingchowensis在肌肉感染肌瘤物种的薄膜中聚集,进一步支持肌肉作为M. Kingchowensis的感染部位。感染鳃的目前的Thelohanellus物种被鉴定为基于孢子形态,生物学性状(宿主特异性和器官特异性)和分子数据的Sun(2006)(标记为T. Sinensis-Sun),鉴定了吞噬鳃的特异性。然而,与T.Inensis Chen et Hsieh的原始描述相比,1960年,目前的Thelohanellus物种和T. Sinensis-Sun感染吉布尔鲤鱼的鳃可区分,从宿主和感染部位中的原始描述中可区分T.Inensis-Sun可疑的有效性。由于在T.Inensis的原始描述中没有分子数据,我们建议将目前的物种和T.Inensis-Sun标记为T.CF. Sinensis以避免混淆,直到Sinensis从类型宿主和型感染部位获得。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号