首页> 外文期刊>Acta odontologica Scandinavica. >Response to: Criticism of the systematic Review (SR) 'centric relation-intercuspal position discrepancy and its relationship with temporomandibular disorders'
【24h】

Response to: Criticism of the systematic Review (SR) 'centric relation-intercuspal position discrepancy and its relationship with temporomandibular disorders'

机译:回应:对系统评价的批评(SR)的中心关系 - 互连差异及其与颞下颌疾病的关系'

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Regarding the letter to the editor sent by Professor Zonnenberg, AJ. to the journal Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, we would like to state the following: In our systematic review (SR), there is no paragraph indicating or suggesting that the terms 'malocclusion' and 'occlusal interference' are equivalent terms. On the contrary, in our manuscript we point to the following: 'In the past, some studies suggested that malocclusion and occlusal interferences were considered as the main factors for predisposition, initiation and perpetuation of Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD)' [1]. The intention of the paragraph was to establish a background where in the recent past the presence of maloc-clusions and occlusal interferences were considered as risk factors for TMD. This is part of the discussion where current evidence shows that occlusion would not be associated directly with the pathophysiology of TMD and would even be considered as a gnathological paradigm [2].
机译:关于Zonnenberg教授发送的编辑的信,AJ。 对于Journal Acta Odontologica Scandinavica,我们想陈述以下内容:在我们的系统评论(SR)中,没有段落指示或表明术语“咬合性”和“封闭干扰”是相同的条款。 相反,在我们的手稿中,我们指出以下内容:“过去,一些研究表明,咬合和咬合干扰被认为是颞下颌疾病(TMD)”(TMD)的易感性,开始和永久性的主要因素。 该段的意图是建立一个背景,在近来过去的存在杀毒性和咬合干扰的存在被认为是TMD的危险因素。 这是讨论的一部分,其中目前的证据表明,闭塞不会直接与TMD的病理生理学联系,甚至将被视为GNathological范式[2]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号