首页> 外文期刊>Acta orthopaedica Belgica. >Comparison of fine needle aspiration and core needle biopsy in the diagnosis of bone tumours
【24h】

Comparison of fine needle aspiration and core needle biopsy in the diagnosis of bone tumours

机译:细针抽吸与核心针活检在骨肿瘤诊断中的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Much literature exists regarding the diagnostic yield and accuracy of core needle biopsy (CNB) and fine needle aspiration (FNA) but none compares both in the same tumour. Ninety-four patients were prospectively studied using a FNA and CNB. With FNA 70 diagnoses were possible (74,5%). Accurate diagnosis rate was 97,1%. In 92 patients (97,9%) a diagnosis was obtained with CNB and 91 (98,9%) were accurate.. The diagnostic yield was 74,5% for FNA and 97,9% for CNB (p < 0.0001). The diagnostic accuracy was 97,1% for FNA and 98,9% for CNB (p =0.5787). Regarding determining malignancy FNA and CNB had 98,3% and 98,5% sensibility, 100% and 100% specificity, 100% and 100% positive predictive value and 95,2% and 96,2% negative predictive value, respectively. In conclusion FNA is as accurate as CNB on all accounts. Despite the reliability of FNA, the number of inconclusive cases makes it an inferior technique when compared with CNB.
机译:关于芯针活检(CNB)和细针抽吸(FNA)的诊断产量和准确度存在许多文献,但没有比较同一肿瘤。 使用FNA和CNB前瞻性地研究了九十四个患者。 具有FNA 70的诊断(74.5%)。 准确的诊断率为97,1%。 在92名患者中(97,9%)用CNB和91(98.9%)获得诊断,精确。用于FNA的诊断产率为74.5%,CNB为97.9%(P <0.0001)。 对于FNA的诊断准确度为97,1%,CNB的98.9%(P = 0.5787)。 关于确定恶性恋FNA和CNB具有98,3%和98.5%的敏感性,100%和100%特异性,100%和100%阳性预测值和95,2%和96,2%的阴性预测值。 总之,FNA与所有账户的CNB一样准确。 尽管FNA的可靠性,但与CNB相比,不确定病例的数量使其成为劣质的技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号