首页> 外文期刊>Academic psychiatry: the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry >Standardized Patients in Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy: a Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators for Implementation
【24h】

Standardized Patients in Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy: a Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators for Implementation

机译:临床心理学和心理治疗的标准化患者:实施障碍和促进者的范围审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives The use of simulated and standardized patients (SP) is widely accepted in the medical field and, from there, is beginning to disseminate into clinical psychology and psychotherapy. The purpose of this study was therefore to systematically review barriers and facilitators that should be considered in the implementation of SP interventions specific to clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Methods Following current guidelines, a scoping review was conducted. The literature search focused on the MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Web of Science databases, including Dissertation Abstracts International. After screening for titles and abstracts, full texts were screened independently and in duplicate according to our inclusion criteria. For data extraction, a pre-defined form was piloted and used. Units of meaning with respect to barriers and facilitators were extracted and categorized inductively using content-analysis techniques. From the results, a matrix of interconnections and a network graph were compiled. Results The 41 included publications were mainly in the fields of psychiatry and mental health nursing, as well as in training and education. The detailed category system contrasts four supercategories, i.e., which organizational and economic aspects to consider, which persons to include as eligible SPs, how to develop adequate scenarios, and how to authentically and consistently portray mental health patients. Conclusions Publications focused especially on the interrelation between authenticity and consistency of portrayals, on how to evoke empathy in learners, and on economic and training aspects. A variety of recommendations for implementing SP programs, from planning to training, monitoring, and debriefing, is provided, for example, ethical screening of and ongoing support for SPs.
机译:目的使用模拟和标准化患者(SP)在医学领域得到广泛接受,从那里开始宣传临床心理和心理治疗。因此,本研究的目的是系统地审查障碍和促进者,这些障碍和促进者应考虑在实施对临床心理学和心理治疗的SP干预措施。方法后指南后,进行了一个范围审查。文献搜索专注于Medline,Psycinfo和科学数据库网,包括论文摘要国际。在筛选标题和摘要后,根据我们的纳入标准,独立筛选全文并重复筛选。对于数据提取,先导和使用预定义形式。利用内容分析技术,提取和分类了屏障和促进剂的含义单位,并用含量分析技术进行分类。从结果,编译了互连矩阵和网络图。结果41包括出版物主要是精神病学和心理健康护理领域,以及培训和教育。详细的类别系统对比四个超类别,即考虑的组织和经济方面,其中包括符合条件的SPS,如何发展充足的情景,以及如何真实地和一致地描绘精神卫生患者。结论出版物尤其是关于对学习者唤起同理心,以及经济和培训方面的如何唤起同情的刊物。提供了用于实施SP程序的各种建议,从计划培训,监测和汇报,例如对SPS的伦理筛查和持续的支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号