首页> 外文期刊>Abdominal radiology. >Relative diagnostic utility of radiologist-recommended abdominal ultrasound following emergency department abdominal and pelvic computed tomography
【24h】

Relative diagnostic utility of radiologist-recommended abdominal ultrasound following emergency department abdominal and pelvic computed tomography

机译:放射科医生的相对诊断效用推荐腹部超声后急诊部腹部和盆腔计算断层扫描

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To retrospectively assess the relative diagnostic utility of radiologist-recommended ultrasound (US) following emergency department (ED) abdominal and pelvic computed tomography (CT) in patients with non-traumatic abdominal and/or pelvic pain. Methods: Blinded to clinical outcomes, two radiology residents and an attending radiologist reviewed radiology reports and relevant medical records for all adult patients from EDs at two academic medical centers from one institution over a 3-year time period, who underwent abdominal/pelvic US within 72 h of an initial IV contrast-enhanced abdominal and pelvic CT for non-traumatic abdominal and/or pelvic pain. Incremental diagnostic utility of subsequent US was deemed present when (1) US findings were discordant with those at CT, or (2) findings were concordant, but US yielded additional relevant diagnostic information. Diagnostic utility was stratified by whether examinations were radiologist-recommended or independently ordered by treating physicians. Results: 319 encounters satisfied the inclusion criteria, including 194 female patients (18-98 years of age, mean of 59.8 years) and 125 male patients (20-90 years of age, mean of 63.2 years). 7 (2.2%) subsequent US examinations were discordant with the initial CT, 100 (31.3%) were concordant but provided relevant additional information, and 212 (66.5%) were concordant without providing additional information, for an overall diagnostic utility of 33.5%. Of subsequent radiologist-recommended US examinations, 70.0% (63/90) yielded incremental diagnostic utility vs. 19.2% (44/229) ordered independently by treating physicians (OR 3.65; 95% CI 2.31-5.75). For those encounters in which US provided incremental diagnostic utility, the most commonly assessed anatomical areas were the biliary system and the female adnexal region. Conclusion: In ED patients with non-traumatic abdominal and/or pelvic pain undergoing abdominal and pelvic CT, follow-up US examinations recommended by radiologists are more likely to provide incremental diagnostic utility than those independently ordered by their treating physicians. In order to optimize the value of advanced imaging, radiologists should assume greater roles in team-based utilization management.
机译:目的:回顾性评估放射科医生推荐超声(US)后急诊症(ED)腹部和盆腔计算机断层扫描(CT)的相关诊断效用,患有非创伤性腹部和/或盆腔疼痛的患者。方法:对临床结果,两个放射学居民和参加放射科医师蒙蔽了临近的放射学报告,以及在两个学术医疗中心的所有成年患者中,从一个三年的时间段,他们在腹部/骨盆美国接受过3年的时间72小时的初始IV对比增强腹部和骨盆CT用于非创伤性​​腹部和/或盆腔疼痛。当(1)与CT中的那些结果不和谐时,我们认为随后美国的增量诊断效用在(1)中,或(2)调查结果是协调一致的,但美国产生了额外的相关诊断信息。诊断效用是通过检查放射科医生的推荐还是通过治疗医生独立订购的诊断效用。结果:319遇到满足纳入标准,包括194名女性患者(18-98岁,平均值59.8岁)和125名男性患者(20-90岁,平均值为63.2岁)。 7(2.2%)随后的美国考试与最初的CT,100(31.3%)表示一致性,但提供了相关的附加信息,212(66.5%)在没有提供其他信息的情况下协调一致,总诊断效用为33.5%。随后的放射科医生推荐美国考试,70.0%(63/90)产生增量诊断效用与19.2%(44/229)通过治疗医生独立订购(或3.65; 95%CI 2.31-5.75)。对于我们提供增量诊断效用的那些遭遇,最常见的解剖区域是胆道系统和雌性附属区域。结论:在腹部和盆腔CT的非创伤性腹部和/或盆腔疼痛患者中,放射科医生推荐的随访美国考试更有可能提供比其治疗医生独立订购的诊断效用。为了优化高级成像的价值,放射科医师应该在基于团队的利用管理中承担更大的角色。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号