首页> 外文期刊>Acta oecologica >Using species abundance distribution models and diversity indices for biogeographical analyses
【24h】

Using species abundance distribution models and diversity indices for biogeographical analyses

机译:使用物种丰度分布模型和多样性指数进行生物地理分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We examine whether Species Abundance Distribution models (SADs) and diversity indices can describe how species colonization status influences species community assembly on oceanic islands. Our hypothesis is that, because of the lack of source-sink dynamics at the archipelago scale, Single Island Endemics (SIEs), i.e. endemic species restricted to only one island, should be represented by few rare species and consequently have abundance patterns that differ from those of more widespread species. To test our hypothesis, we used arthropod data from the Azorean archipelago (North Atlantic). We divided the species into three colonization categories: SIEs, archipelagic endemics (AZEs, present in at least two islands) and native non-endemics (NATs). For each category, we modelled rank-abundance plots using both the geometric series and the Gambin model, a measure of distributional amplitude. We also calculated Shannon entropy and Buzas and Gibson's evenness. We show that the slopes of the regression lines modelling SADs were significantly higher for SIEs, which indicates a relative predominance of a few highly abundant species and a lack of rare species, which also depresses diversity indices. This may be a consequence of two factors: (i) some forest specialist SIEs may be at advantage over other, less adapted species; (ii) the entire populations of SIEs are by definition concentrated on a single island, without possibility for inter-island source-sink dynamics; hence all populations must have a minimum number of individuals to survive natural, often unpredictable, fluctuations. These findings are supported by higher values of the alpha parameter of the Gambin mode for SIEs. In contrast, AZEs and NATs had lower regression slopes, lower alpha but higher diversity indices, resulting from their widespread distribution over several islands. We conclude that these differences in the SAD models and diversity indices demonstrate that the study of these metrics is useful for biogeographical purposes. (C) 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
机译:我们检查物种丰富度分布模型(SADs)和多样性指数是否可以描述物种定殖状态如何影响海洋岛屿上物种群落的组装。我们的假设是,由于缺乏群岛规模的源汇动态,因此单岛特有物种(SIE)(即仅限于一个岛的特有物种)应以很少的稀有物种表示,因此其丰度模式与那些更广泛的物种。为了检验我们的假设,我们使用了亚速尔群岛(北大西洋)的节肢动物数据。我们将该物种分为三个殖民地类别:SIE,群岛特有物种(AZE,至少存在于两个岛中)和本地非特有物种(NAT)。对于每个类别,我们都使用几何级数和甘比模型(分布振幅的度量)对秩富图进行建模。我们还计算了香农熵和布萨斯和吉布森的均匀度。我们显示,对于SIEs,建模SAD的回归线的斜率显着更高,这表明一些高度丰富的物种相对相对占优势,而稀有物种则相对不足,这也压低了多样性指数。这可能是由于以下两个因素造成的:(i)一些森林专家SIE可能比其他适应性较差的物种更具优势; (ii)从定义上讲,所有东南工业国家的人口都集中在单个岛屿上,没有岛屿间源汇动态的可能性;因此,所有人口都必须拥有最少数量的个体,以度过自然的,常常是无法预测的波动。这些发现得到了SIE的Gambin模式的alpha参数的更高值的支持。相比之下,AZE和NAT的回归斜率较低,α较低,但多样性指数较高,这是由于它们在多个岛屿上的广泛分布所致。我们得出的结论是,SAD模型和多样性指数中的这些差异表明,对这些指标进行研究对于生物地理目的是有用的。 (C)2015 Elsevier Masson SAS。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号