Efficacy of telaprevir and boceprevir in treatment-na?ve and treatment-experienced genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C patients: An indirect comparison using Bayesian network meta-analysis

摘要

Background and aims: To indirectly compare the efficacy of telaprevir (TVR) and boceprevir (BOC) combined with peginterferon/ribavirin ?2a/2b (PR) in achieving sustained viral response (SVR) in treatment-na飗e and treatment-experienced patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials reporting the efficacy of PR-based treatment in genotype 1 chronic HCV patients. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed on the endpoint of SVR, assuming fixed study effects. For treatment-experienced patients, only previous relapsers and partial responders were included, as no results in prior null responders were available for boceprevir. Results: Eleven publications were included. In treatment-na飗e patients, the odds ratios (OR) (posterior median [95% credible interval]) for telaprevir (12 weeks response guided treatment [RGT] 24/48 weeks PR) and boceprevir (24 weeks RGT 28/48 weeks PR) versus PR were respectively 3.80 (2.78-5.22) and 2.99 (2.23-4.01). The OR for telaprevir versus boceprevir was 1.42 (0.89-2.25), with a probability for telaprevir being more effective (P[OR>1]) of 0.93. In treatment-experienced patients, the OR of telaprevir (12 weeks 48 weeks PR) and boceprevir (32 weeks RGT 36/48 weeks PR) versus PR were respectively 13.11 (7.30-24.43) and 5.36 (2.90-10.30). The OR for telaprevir versus boceprevir was 2.45 (1.02-5.80), with telaprevir having a probability of 0.98 of being more effective. Limitations: The main limitation of this study is the low number of trials included in the analysis, especially for the treatment-experienced patient population, which only allowed random-effect models to be explored. We tried to identify potential biases due to study heterogeneity. Conclusions: In the absence of direct comparative head-to-head studies between telaprevir and boceprevir for the treatment of chronic HCV genotype 1 patients, an indirect comparison based on Bayesian network meta-analysis suggests better efficacy for telaprevir than boceprevir in both treatment-na飗e and treatment- experienced patients.