首页> 外文期刊>Current medical research and opinion >Resource utilization impact of topiramate for migraine prevention in the managed-care setting.
【24h】

Resource utilization impact of topiramate for migraine prevention in the managed-care setting.

机译:托管保管环境中偏头发预防托盘的资源利用影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To determine the pattern of headache-related resource utilization and costs before and after initiation of preventive migraine treatment with topiramate in a sample of a large managed-care population. METHODS: This study was a retrospective, longitudinal, cohort study analysis of medical and pharmacy claims using The HealthCore Integrated Research Network Database. Patients were required to have had at least one pharmacy claim for topiramate between 7/1/00 and 11/30/04, and at least 12 dosage units dispensed of any combination of acute migraine treatments (triptan, ergotamine, or ergotamine combination) during the 6-month period preceding the first pharmacy claim for topiramate (the index date). Headache-related inpatient and outpatient resource utilizations were compared pre-index vs. post-index period 1 (months 1-6) and pre-index vs. post-index period 2 (months 7-12). Statistical analyses included McNemar tests for categorical variables and paired t-tests for continuous variables. RESULTS: A total of 3246 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean (+/- SD) age was 44 +/- 10 years and 88% were female. From pre- to post-index period 2, outpatient visits significantly decreased by 30% (p < 0.0001), diagnostic procedures decreased by 74% (p = 0.0013), emergency room (ER) visits decreased by 27% (p < 0.0001), and abortive prescriptions decreased by 25% (p < 0.0001). No significant differences were found in mean number of hospitalization days. Total headache-related inpatient costs and outpatient costs decreased (p < 0.01) during post-index period 2 (43 and 46%, respectively). Headache-related pharmacy costs increased from pre- to post-index period 2. CONCLUSION: Topiramate treatment for migraine prevention was associated with significantly lower healthcare resource use (ER visits, diagnostics, acute treatment) in the first 6 months of treatment, with continuing decreases, including physician office visits, during the second 6 months of treatment. Limitations: Since this study is a claims-based analysis there is the potential introduction of non-claims identifiable factors that might influence resource use such as lifestyle modifications and over-the-counter medications. In addition, adherence to topiramate treatment was not accounted for in this study. Nonetheless, this study provides important insights into the benefit of preventive migraine treatment in actual clinical practice.
机译:目的:确定在大型管理人口的样本中,在预防偏头痛治疗之前和成本之前和成本的比例。方法:本研究是使用医疗综合集成研究网络数据库的医疗和药房索赔的回顾性,纵向,队列研究分析。患者需要至少在7/1/00和11/30/04之间的托吡酯的至少一种药物索赔,并且至少12剂单位分配了急性偏头痛治疗(曲坦,麦醇胺或麦种组合)的任何组合第一次药房索赔的6个月期间托阿拉明酸盐(指数日期)。与索引后索引与索引期间1(月1-6)和索引前索引期与索引后2(月7-12)进行比较,比较了与索引预索引与索引期间的索引与索引期间和门外资源利用率。统计分析包括用于分类变量的McNemar测试和用于连续变量的配对T检验。结果:共有3246名患者达到纳入标准。平均值(+/- SD)年龄为44 +/- 10岁,女性为88%。从索引前期2时,门诊视景率明显减少30%(P <0.0001),诊断程序减少74%(P = 0.0013),急诊室(ER)访问减少27%(P <0.0001)并且流产处方减少了25%(P <0.0001)。在平均住院日期内没有发现显着差异。与索引后期间2(分别为43和46%)期间,与头痛相关的住院成本和门诊成本降低(P <0.01)。与索引前期的表演相关的药房成本增加了2.结论:脱脂治疗偏头痛预防的治疗与治疗前6个月的医疗资源使用(ER访问,诊断,急性治疗)显着降低,继续减少,包括医师办公室访问,在治疗后的第二个月内。局限性:由于本研究是基于索赔的分析,存在可能引入可能影响资源使用的非索赔可识别因素,例如生活方式修改和柜台过度的药物。此外,本研究中未占托吡酯治疗的粘附。尽管如此,本研究向实际临床实践中预防性偏头痛治疗的益处提供了重要的见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号