首页> 外文期刊>Current medical research and opinion >Assessment of adherence to medication in patients after myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. Is there a place for newself-reported questionnaires?
【24h】

Assessment of adherence to medication in patients after myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. Is there a place for newself-reported questionnaires?

机译:经皮冠状动脉干预治疗心肌梗死后患者依赖于药物治疗的评估。 是否有新的新手问卷的地方?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: Non-adherence to medication regimen after myocardial infarction (MI) leads to increased morbidity and mortality and generates additional cost to the healthcare system. Objectives: The aim of this systematic review was to critically discuss assessment methods of adherence to medication in patients after myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention and the possible application of a new self-reported questionnaire. Methods: A systematic investigation of all published literature was conducted to minimize the risk of bias. A database search (PubMed, CENTRAL and Google Scholar databases) from January 1998 through December 2017. Results: Adequate assessment of patient adherence to treatment is necessary to understand the potential for adverse outcomes. Methods developed for adherence evaluation are classified as subjective and objective or as direct and indirect. Direct, objective measures reflect pharmacokinetics and include measurement of the drug or its metabolite concentration, evaluation of the presence of biological markers given with the drug and direct observation of patients' medication-taking behavior. Several indirect, objective methods are based on evaluation of the availability of prescribed medications assuming that medication is taken exactly as prescribed. Assessment of the effectiveness of treatment, both at the pharmacodynamic and clinical level, indirectly but objectively reflects adherence to treatment. Subjective methods, including patient-kept diaries, patient interviews and self-reported questionnaires, due to their simplicity, real-time feedback and low cost, are often used for adherence evaluation in clinical practice. Conclusions: In spite of the availability, convenience and variety of methods, measuring adherence still remains a real challenge. Using a well designed questionnaire provides an opportunity to identify patients at increased risk of non-adherence and the obstacles impeding implementation of the treatment plan, allowing implementation of tailored interventions in order to improve patient medication-taking behavior.
机译:简介:心肌梗死后的药物方案(MI)未遵守药物治疗,导致发病率和死亡率增加,并为医疗保健系统产生额外的成本。目的:这种系统审查的目的是批判性地讨论心肌梗死后患者依赖于药物治疗的评估方法,经皮冠状动脉干预治疗,并可能申请新的自我报告的问卷。方法:进行了对所有公布文献的系统调查,以最大限度地减少偏倚的风险。 1998年1月至2017年12月的数据库搜索(PubMed,Central和Google Scholar数据库)。结果:有必要对患者遵守治疗进行足够的评估,以了解不利结果的潜力。为遵守评估制定的方法被归类为主观和目标或直接和间接。直接,客观措施反映药代动力学,包括药物或其代谢物浓度的测量,评价药物的生物标志物存在,并直接观察患者的药物治疗行为。几种间接,客观方法是基于评估规定药物的可用性,假设药物完全按照规定进行药物。评估治疗的有效性,在药效学和临床水平,间接而客观地反映依赖于治疗。主观方法,包括患者保持日记,患者访谈和自我报告的调查问卷,由于它们的简单性,实时反馈和低成本通常用于临床实践中的依从性评估。结论:尽管提供了便利性和各种方法,但衡量依从性仍然是一个真正的挑战。使用精心设计的问卷提供了一个机会,以识别患者的不遵守风险增加以及阻碍治疗计划的实施的障碍,允许实施量身定制的干预措施以改善患者的药物治疗行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号