...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition >A comparison of the effect of supplementation and sunlight exposure on serum vitamin D and parathyroid hormone: A systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

A comparison of the effect of supplementation and sunlight exposure on serum vitamin D and parathyroid hormone: A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:补充与阳光暴露对血清维生素D和甲状旁腺激素的影响的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Supplementation and getting sunlight exposure are two treatments for vitamin D deficiency. However, studies reported conteroversial findings regarding the efficacy of these two methods. Objective: To compare the effect of oral vitamin D supplementation with sunlight exposure on serum vitamin D and parathyroid hormone (PTH). Methods: A computer-based literature search through PubMed, Scopus and Google scholar search engines was conducted until April 2019 to find clinical trials which compared the effect of oral vitamin D supplementation with sunlight exposure on serum vitamin D and PTH. Means for serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D3 (25(OH) D3) and PTH concentration were extracted. A subgroup analysis was used to detect potential sources of inter-study heterogeneity. Mean differences (MD) were analyzed using a random-effects model (the DerSimonian-Laird approach). Results: A total of seven papers were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled analysis showed that vitamin D supplementation significantly elevated levels of serum 25(OH) D3 in comparison with sunlight exposure (MD: 8.56nmol/l, 95%CI: 4.15, 12.97, T-2 = 40.32%, H-2 = 9.45%, P for heterogeneity p < 0.001). Also, the difference between the effect of vitamin D supplementation and sun exposure was lower in studies which used UVB radiation compared with studies which applied direct sunlight (MD: 11.65 nmol/l, 95%CI: 7.02, 16.28; P for between subgroup heterogeneity = 0.001). Conclusion: Vitamin D supplementation was more effective than sun exposure at increasing serum 25(OH) D3. The difference between efficacy of vitamin D supplementation and sun exposure was lower in studies which used long-term sun exposure or applied UVB treatment instead of direct sunlight.
机译:背景:补充和阳光照射是维生素D缺乏的两种治疗方法。然而,研究报告了关于这两种方法的疗效的突出结果。目的:比较口服维生素D补充在血清维生素D和甲状旁腺激素(PTH)上的影响。方法:通过PubMed,Scopus和Google Scholar搜索引擎进行基于计算机的文献搜索,直到2019年4月发现临床试验,这些试验比较了口服维生素D补充在血清维生素D和PTH上的阳光暴露的疗效。提取血清25-羟基维生素D3(25(OH)D3)和PTH浓度的手段。亚组分析用于检测学习间异质性的潜在来源。使用随机效应模型(Dersimonian-Laird方法)分析平均差异(MD)。结果:荟萃分析中共有七篇论文。汇总分析表明,维生素D补充了阳光暴露(MD:8.56nmol / L,95%CI:4.15,12.97,T-2 = 40.32%,H-2 = 9.45 %,p用于异质性p <0.001)。此外,维生素D补充和太阳暴露的效果之间的差异在研究中利用UVB辐射与阳光直射(MD:11.65 Nmol / L,95%Ci:7.02,16.28; P亚组异质性的研究相比= 0.001)。结论:维生素D补充比在增加血清25(OH)D3时的阳光暴露更有效。维生素D补充和阳光暴露的疗效之间的差异在研究中使用长期阳光暴露或应用UVB处理而不是直射阳光。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号