...
首页> 外文期刊>Contemporary clinical trials >Randomized evaluation of trial acceptability by INcentive (RETAIN): Study protocol for two embedded randomized controlled trials
【24h】

Randomized evaluation of trial acceptability by INcentive (RETAIN): Study protocol for two embedded randomized controlled trials

机译:激励(保留)随机评估试验可接受性:两个嵌入式随机对照试验的研究方案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction The most common and conceptually sound ethical concerns with financial incentives for research participation are that they may (1) represent undue inducements by blunting peoples' perceptions of research risks, thereby preventing fully informed consent; or (2) represent unjust inducements by encouraging enrollment preferentially among the poor. Neither of these concerns has been shown to manifest in studies testing the effects of incentives on decisions to participate in hypothetical randomized clinical trials (RCTs), but neither has been assessed in real RCTs.
机译:介绍研究参与的最常见和概念性良好的道德问题是,他们可能(1)通过拖累人们对研究风险的看法来表示过度的诱因,从而防止了完全知情同意; 或(2)通过促进穷人的令人鼓舞的招生来代表不公正的诱惑。 这些担忧都没有显示出现在研究激励措施关于参与假设的随机临床试验(RCT)的决策的影响,但也没有评估真正的RCT。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号