...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical pathways in cardiology >Implementation of an Early Discharge Protocol and Chest Pain Clinic for Low-Risk Chest Pain in the Emergency Department
【24h】

Implementation of an Early Discharge Protocol and Chest Pain Clinic for Low-Risk Chest Pain in the Emergency Department

机译:在急诊部门的低风险胸痛患者早期排出方案和胸痛诊所的实施

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Most of the patients presenting to emergency department with chest pain are at low risk of adverse events. Identifying high-risk patients can be challenging and resource intensive. Methods: We created a protocol to assist early discharge of low-risk adults with chest pain from emergency department. Also a chest pain clinic (CPC) was started for cardiology follow-up within 72 hours. In a retrospective cohort study, primary outcome of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) of death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization was compared between CPC patients and those hospitalized for observation. In addition, rate of observation admissions and MACE were compared in the pre- and postintervention periods using piecewise regression and multiple logistic regression, respectively. Results: A total of 1422 patients were admitted for observation, and 290 were seen in CPC in the 1-year postintervention period. Thirty-day MACE was very low (0.7% in observation and 0.3% in CPC) postintervention. A total of 3637 patients were admitted for observation over the 2-year preintervention period. Thirty-day–adjusted MACE rate was not significantly different between pre- and postintervention periods (0.4% vs. 0.6%, P = 0.3), also monthly observation admissions did not change significantly; however, utilization of stress testing (57.2% vs. 41.0%, P < 0.001) and cardiac catheterization (2.3% vs. 1.6%, P = 0.036) was reduced. Conclusion: Chest pain patients admitted for observation and risk stratification are at very low risk of 30-day MACE. An intervention based on a chest pain protocol and availability of early cardiology follow-up did not change the admission rate of these patients. This intervention was not associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes.
机译:背景:患有胸痛急诊部的大多数患者处于低危险事件的风险。识别高风险患者可能是挑战性和资源密集的。方法:我们创建了一种协议,以协助急诊部门的胸痛提前排放低风险成年人。此外,胸痛诊所(CPC)在72小时内开始在心脏病学随访。在回顾性的队列研究中,在CPC患者和住院观察中的观察中,比较了死亡,心肌梗死或血运重建的主要不良心脏事件(血管)的主要结果。此外,使用分段回归和多重逻辑回归分别比较观察录取和立柱的速度。结果:共有1422名患者入学,在1年后,在1年的临时入学期间见过290名。第30天的迈斯非常低(观察中的0.7%,CPC的0.3%)。共有3637名患者在两年的急性期间录取了观察。预期和后期间的均衡术率在和后期间没有显着差异(0.4%与0.6%,P = 0.3),每月观察录取也没有显着变化;然而,降低了应力测试的使用(57.2%,P <0.001)和心脏导管插入(2.3%vs.1.6%,P = 0.036)。结论:入住观察和风险分层的胸痛患者均具有30天的爵士风险非常低。基于胸痛协议的干预和早期心脏病学随访的可用性没有改变这些患者的入学率。这种干预与不良结果的风险增加无关。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Critical pathways in cardiology》 |2018年第1期|共5页
  • 作者单位

    Division of Cardiovascular Disease Baystate Medical Center Springfield MA;

    Division of Cardiovascular Disease Baystate Medical Center Springfield MA;

    Division of Cardiovascular Disease Baystate Medical Center Springfield MA;

    Division of Cardiovascular Disease Baystate Medical Center Springfield MA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 内科学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号