...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical care medicine >Epinephrine for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis*
【24h】

Epinephrine for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis*

机译:肾上腺素禁止医院心脏骤停:更新的系统评论和META分析*

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: To perform an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials evaluating epinephrine for adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. Data Sources: The search included MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Ovid Evidence-Based Medicine, clinical trial registries, and bibliographies. Study Selection: Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials that compared the current standard dose of epinephrine to placebo, high or low dose epinephrine, any other vasopressor alone or in combination were screened by three independent reviewers. Data Extraction: Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials that compared the current standard dose of epinephrine to placebo, high or low dose epinephrine, any other vasopressor alone or in combination were screened by three independent reviewers. Data Synthesis: A total of 17 trials (21,510 patients) were included; seven were judged to be at high risk of bias. Compared to placebo, pooled results from two trials showed that standard dose of epinephrine increased return of spontaneous circulation (risk ratio, 3.09; 95% CI, 2.82-3.89), survival to hospital admission (risk ratio, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.68-3.72), and survival to discharge (risk ratio, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.11-1.86). The largest placebo-controlled trial showed that standard dose of epinephrine also improved survival at 30 days and 3 months but not neurologic outcomes, standard dose of epinephrine decreased return of spontaneous circulation (risk ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.77-0.98) and survival to admission (risk ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78-0.99) when compared with high dose epinephrine. There were no differences in outcomes between standard dose of epinephrine and vasopressin alone or in combination with epinephrine. Conclusions: Largely based on one randomized controlled trial, standard dose of epinephrine improved overall survival but not neurologic outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients compared with placebo. There is a paucity of trials with meaningful patient outcomes; future epinephrine trials should evaluate dose and method of delivery on long-term survival, neurologic function, and quality of life after cardiac arrest.
机译:目的:进行临床试验的更新系统评论和荟萃分析,评估肾上腺素的肾上腺素灭火复苏肾上腺素。数据来源:搜索包括Medline,Embase和Ovid循证医学,临床试验室和书目。学习选择:随机和准随机对照试验,将目前标准剂量的肾上腺素与安慰剂,高或低剂量肾上腺素进行比较,仅通过三个独立审查员筛查任何其他血管加压液或组合。数据提取:随机和准随机对照试验,将目前标准剂量的肾上腺素与安慰剂,高或低剂量肾上腺素相比,由三个独立审查员筛查任何其他血管加压液或组合。数据合成:包括17项试验(21,510名患者);七名被认为是偏见的高风险。与安慰剂相比,来自两个试验的合并结果表明,标准剂量的肾上腺素增加了自发循环的返回(风险比,3.09; 95%CI,2.82-3.89),入院入院的生存(风险比,2.50; 95%CI,1.68 -3.72),并存活排放(风险比,1.44; 95%CI,1.11-1.86)。最大的安慰剂对照试验表明,标准剂量的肾上腺素在30天和3个月内还提高了生存率,但不是神经系统结果,标准剂量的肾上腺素循环返回(风险比率为0.87; 95%CI,0.77-0.98)和与高剂量肾上腺素相比,存活(风险比率为0.88; 95%CI,0.78-0.99)。单独或与肾上腺素组合或与肾上腺素组合的标准剂量和血管加压素之间的结果没有差异。结论:主要基于一个随机对照试验,标准剂量的肾上腺素改善整体存活,但与安慰剂相比,医院外心脏骤停患者的神经系统结果。缺乏有意义的患者结果的试验;未来肾上腺素试验应评估长期存活,神经系统功能和心脏骤停后寿命的递送的剂量和方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号