...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical care medicine >Effects of Rehabilitation Interventions on Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials*
【24h】

Effects of Rehabilitation Interventions on Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials*

机译:康复干预对重症病患者临床结果的影响:随机对照试验的系统审查与荟萃分析*

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives: To assess the impact of rehabilitation in ICU on clinical outcomes. Data Sources: Secondary data analysis of randomized controlled trials published between 1998 and October 2019 was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Study Selection: We have selected trials investigating neuromuscular electrical stimulation or cycling exercises or protocolized physical rehabilitation as compared to standard of care in critically ill adults. Data Extraction: Mortality, length of stay in ICU and at hospital, days on mechanical ventilator, and adverse events. Data Synthesis: We found 43 randomized controlled trials (nine on cycling, 14 on neuromuscular electrical stimulation alone and 20 on protocolized physical rehabilitation) into which 3,548 patients were randomized and none of whom experienced an intervention-related serious adverse event. The exercise interventions had no influence on mortality (odds ratio 0.94 [0.79-1.12],n= 38 randomized controlled trials) but reduced duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference, -1.7 d [-2.5 to -0.8 d],n= 32, length of stay in ICU (-1.2 d [-2.5 to 0.0 d],n= 32) but not at hospital (-1.6 [-4.3 to 1.2 d],n= 23). The effects on the length of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay were only significant for the protocolized physical rehabilitation subgroup and enhanced in patients with longer ICU stay and lower Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores. There was no benefit of early start of the intervention. It is likely that the dose of rehabilitation delivered was much lower than dictated by the protocol in many randomized controlled trials and negative results may reflect the failure to implement the intervention. Conclusions: Rehabilitation interventions in critically ill patients do not influence mortality and are safe. Protocolized physical rehabilitation significantly shortens time spent on mechanical ventilation and in ICU, but this does not consistently translate into long-term functional benefit. Stable patients with lower Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II at admission (<20) and prone to protracted ICU stay may benefit most from rehabilitation interventions.
机译:目标:评估康复对ICU对临床结果的影响。数据来源:1998年至2019年10月期间公布的随机对照试验的二级数据分析按照系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行。学习选择:我们选择试验调查神经肌肉电气刺激或循环锻炼或协议的身体康复,与批评性的病例的护理标准相比。数据提取:死亡率,ICU和医院住宿的长度,机械通风机的天数,以及不良事件。数据合成:我们发现43种随机对照试验(循环循环,14次单独的神经肌肉电气刺激,20次协议的物理康复),3,548名患者随机化,其中没有人经历过干预相关的严重不良事件。运动干预措施对死亡率没有影响(0.94 [0.79-1.12],n = 38个随机对照试验),但是机械通气持续时间降低(平均差异,-1.7d [-2.5至-0.8d],n = 32 ,ICU的寿命长度(-1.2d [-2.5至0.0 d],n = 32)但不在医院(-1.6 [-4.3至1.2d],n = 23)。对机械通气长度的影响和ICU的ICU保持仅为ICU寿命较长的患者和急性生理学和慢性健康评估II分数的患者患者的重要性。没有利益。早期开始干预。很可能是康复剂量的康复在许多随机对照试验中,议定书的交付低得多,负面结果可能反映未能实施干预的失败。结论:危重病人的康复干预患者不会影响死亡率,并且是安全的。协议的身体康复标志通过在机械通风和ICU上花费的时间缩短,但这并不一致转化为长期功能效益。急性生理学和慢性健康评估II的稳定患者在入场(<20)中,并且易于持续持续的ICU停留可能受益于康复干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号