首页> 外文期刊>Criminal behaviour and mental health: CBMH >Use of self-reported psychopathy assessments with older adults: An update on evaluation of their psychometrics for people over 60 years
【24h】

Use of self-reported psychopathy assessments with older adults: An update on evaluation of their psychometrics for people over 60 years

机译:使用年龄较大的成年人的自我报告的精神病评估:关于60多年来人员对其心理学分辨学评估的更新

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background Psychometric properties of self-report psychopathy scales have generally been established in samples of people under the age of 40. Personality traits are, however, likely to persist into old age, so it is important to understand the performance of user-friendly self-report psychopathy measures among older people. Aims Methods The aims of this study were to find out the extent to which self-reported scales developed for rating psychopathy have been used with people of 60 years or older and the extent of any evidence that the psychometric properties of the scales vary with age. A systematic literature review, with searching limited to PubMed, EBSCOhost, and Google Scholar for the years 1990-2017, of studies of the psychometric properties of five prominent self-report psychopathy scales: the Self-Report Psychopathy Scale, Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale, Psychopathic Personality Inventory, Triarchic Psychopathy Measure, and the Elemental Psychopathy Assessment according to age of participants. Results Conclusions and Implications for Future Research Fourteen studies were found for the years 1990-2017. Age ranges in these samples are wide, with a typical mean age of approximately 30 years. None of these studies focused solely on adults of 60 years or older or attempted to isolate findings by specific age group. Studies of the use of self-rated psychopathy tools remain inconclusive about their psychometrics in older people. Further investigations should follow three main paths: first, deriving samples solely of older adults from the general population-to improve the generalisability of their results; second, item response theory methods should be used to detect differential item functioning between younger and older adults; finally, modifications of extant measures with and without items with potential age-bias should be tested.
机译:背景,自我报告精神病变尺度的心理测量特性通常在40岁以下的人的样本中建立了。然而,人格特征可能会持续到旧时期,因此了解用户友好的自我表现非常重要报告老年人的精神病理措施。目的方法本研究的目的是找出为评级精神病的自我报告的尺度已经与60岁或以上的人一起使用以及任何证据表明尺度的心理学特性随着年龄而变化的任何证据。一个系统的文献综述,搜索限于1990 - 2017年的PubMed,EBSCohost和Google Scholar,研究五个突出的自我报告精神病变尺度的心理测量性质:自我报告精神病变规模,Levenson自我报告精神病理规模,精神病患者库存,三官精神病措施,以及根据参与者年龄的基因精神病评估。结果结论和对未来研究的影响为1990 - 2017年未来研究的14项研究。这些样品中的年龄范围宽,典型平均年龄约为30年。这些研究均不专注于60岁或以上的成年人或试图通过特定年龄组孤立调查结果。对自我评价的精神病理学工具的使用研究仍然是对老年人的心理学性能缺乏。进一步的调查应遵循三个主要路径:首先,仅仅从一般人群中获得老年人的样品 - 以提高结果的可持续性;其次,项目响应理论方法应用于检测年轻人和老年人之间的差异项目;最后,应测试使用具有潜在年龄偏差的现存措施的改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号