...
首页> 外文期刊>Contraception >Psychological distress and post-abortion contraceptive method effectiveness level chosen at an urban clinic
【24h】

Psychological distress and post-abortion contraceptive method effectiveness level chosen at an urban clinic

机译:在城市诊所选择心理困扰和堕胎后避孕药效果水平

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective We investigated whether more psychological distress before an abortion is associated with the effectiveness of contraception selected (low, moderate, or high effectiveness) at an abortion clinic visit. Method Using data from 253 women attending an urban abortion clinic that primarily serves low-income women, we tested the association between pre-abortion psychological distress and the effectiveness level of post-abortion contraceptive choice. Based on typical use failure rates, we classified effectiveness of contraceptive choice into three levels - low, moderate, and high effectiveness. We measured psychological distress with four validated measures of depressive, anxious, and stress symptoms, and negative affect, as well as with a global measure comprising these four measures. We used multivariable ordinal logistic regression to measure the association of each psychological distress measure with post-abortion contraceptive method effectiveness level, adjusting for sociodemographic factors, pregnancy history, trimester of abortion, and importance of avoiding pregnancy in the next year. Results We found that compared to women experiencing less stress symptoms, negative affect and global psychological distress, women experiencing more stress symptoms [AOR=1.028, 95% CI: 1.001-1.050], negative affect [AOR=1.05, 95% CI: 1.01-1.09] and global psychological distress [AOR=1.46, 95% CI: 1.09-1.95] were more likely to choose more effective versus less effective methods, p<.05, in adjusted models. Using dichotomous psychological measures we found similar results. Conclusions Women experiencing more psychological distress before an abortion selected more effective contraceptive methods after their abortion. Future research should examine whether this distress is associated with subsequent contraceptive use or continuation. Implications The current study suggests that contraceptive providers should not assume that women experiencing more psychological distress prefer to use less effective contraceptive methods.
机译:目的我们研究了在流产诊所访问中所选择的避孕效果(低,中等或高效率)的避孕有效性是否有更多的心理困扰。使用来自253名妇女的数据的方法,参加城市流产诊所,主要用于低收入妇女,我们测试了堕胎前心理困扰与堕胎后避孕选择的有效性水平之间的关联。基于典型的使用失败利率,我们将避孕选择的有效性分为三个水平 - 低,中等和高效率。我们用四种验证,焦虑和压力症状的措施测量了心理困扰,以及负面影响,以及包括这四项措施的全球措施。我们使用多变量的序数逻辑回归来衡量每种心理痛苦措施的关联,与后流产避孕药效果水平,调整社会造影因子,怀孕历史,堕胎苗条,避免怀孕的重要性。结果我们发现,与体育症状减少,负面影响和全球心理困扰相比,妇女经历更多的压力症状[AOR = 1.028,95%CI:1.001-1.050],负面影响[AOR = 1.05,95%CI:1.01 -1.09]和全球心理窘迫[AOR = 1.46,95%CI:1.09-1.95]更有可能选择更有效的与较低的有效方法P <.05,在调整后的模型中。使用二分法心理措施,我们发现了类似的结果。结论妇女在流产后堕胎后的堕胎后经历了更多的心理困扰。未来的研究应该检查这种困扰是否与随后的避孕使用或延续相关。致力于目前的研究表明,避孕药商不应该假设女性经历更多的心理困扰更喜欢使用较少有效的避孕方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号