首页> 外文期刊>Behavioral interventions >The effect of response interruption and redirection with and without a differential reinforcement of alternative behavior component on stereotypy and appropriate responses
【24h】

The effect of response interruption and redirection with and without a differential reinforcement of alternative behavior component on stereotypy and appropriate responses

机译:响应中断与重定向与差异加强替代行为组分对陈规定型和适当响应的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Individuals with an Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) often engage in repetitive and stereotypic behaviors (American Psychological Association, 2013). Therefore, interventions that reduce stereotypy and potentially increase appropriate responses are of interest in the field of applied behavior analysis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the isolated and additive effects of response interruption and redirection (RIRD) and differential reinforcement of alternative behavior (DRA) on both stereotypy and appropriate responses to determine whether either of these interventions alone or in combination is more effective and more efficient in increasing appropriate responses and decreasing stereotypy. Results showed that both RIRD and RIRD + DRA were effective interventions in decreasing stereotypy, but no procedure resulted in a sustained increase in appropriate responses.
机译:具有自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的个人经常从事重复和陈规定型行为(美国心理协会,2013年)。 因此,减少陈规定型和潜在增加适当反应的干预措施对应用行为分析领域感兴趣。 本研究的目的是评估响应中断和重定向(RIRC)和差异增强替代行为(DRA)对刻板印象和适当反应的差异增强,以确定这些干预措施是否更有效 在增加适当的反应和减少陈规定型的情况下更有效。 结果表明,Rird和Rird + DRA都有有效的干预措施降低陈规定型,但没有导致适当反应的持续增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号