...
首页> 外文期刊>Conservation & society >Exploring Institutional Factors Influencing Equity in Two Payments for Ecosystem Service Schemes
【24h】

Exploring Institutional Factors Influencing Equity in Two Payments for Ecosystem Service Schemes

机译:探索影响股权的机构因素,以两次支付生态系统服务计划

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) are considered promising instruments for promoting conservation and addressing socio-economic goals, including equity. While several studies analyse how institutions enable the delivery of cost effective conservation, fewer studies focus on the role that informal institutions play in influencing equitable outcomes especially in Africa. Focussing on the role of formal and informal institutions, this article contributes to the emergence of work that reflects alternative conceptualisations to mainstream neoclassical understandings of PES. A qualitative research approach is applied analysing two Kenyan cases to illustrate how historical institutional processes influence present day equity outcomes. The study explores both procedural and distributive equity. The results reveal that despite very similar land tenure origins, the schemes differ considerably regarding their equity outcomes. Formal and informal institutional interplay was found to influence perceptions of land value over time and bargaining processes are identified as determinants of the different equity outcomes. The study also reveals that institutional interplay may influence the simultaneous achievement of different equity dimensions. The study therefore recommends the integration of mechanisms that reconcile both formal and informal institutions, such as land tenure distribution and cultural norms in design and implementation of PES schemes to better achieve equity.
机译:为生态系统服务(PE)的付款被认为是促进保护和解决社会经济目标,包括公平的有希望的仪器。虽然有几项研究分析了机构如何能够提供成本效益的保护,但更少的研究侧重于非正式机构在影响公平的成果方面发挥的作用,特别是在非洲。专注于正规和非正式机构的作用,本文有助于出现反映替代概念的替代概念,以主流新古典主义理解PES。采用定性研究方法分析了两个肯尼亚案例,以说明历史制度流程如何影响现今的股权结果。该研究探讨了程序和分配股权。结果表明,尽管土地统治起源非常相似,但这些计划对其公平结果有了大量不同。发现正式和非正式的机构相互作用,影响对土地价值的看法随着时间的推移,讨价还价的过程被确定为不同股权结果的决定因素。该研究还揭示了机构相互作用可能影响不同股权维度的同时实现。因此,该研究建议将协调正规和非正式机构的机制纳入,例如在设计和实施PES方案方面的土地任期分布和文化规范,以更好地实现股权。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号