首页> 外文期刊>Computers & Fluids >Comparative study of boundary layer control around an ordinary airfoil and a high lift airfoil with secondary blowing
【24h】

Comparative study of boundary layer control around an ordinary airfoil and a high lift airfoil with secondary blowing

机译:普通翼型边界层控制的比较研究及二次吹塑的高升力翼型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Boundary layer separation over an airfoil causes large energy losses and strong adverse pressure gradients. This in turn leads to a reduction in the lift force and an increase in the drag force. Therefore delaying or if possible, eliminating the flow separation is mandatory. The elimination of flow separation would permit higher angles of attack for many practical applications. Steady blowing on the suction side of the airfoil is found to be effective in controlling the boundary layer separation. Flow around NACA0012 and LA203A airfoils are analysed in the present study, with the position of the secondary blowing jet at 60 percent of the chord length and angles of attack ranging from 2 to 18 degrees for NACA0012 and 2 to 20 degrees for LA203A. The secondary blowing velocity is varied from 0 percent to 40 percent of the free stream velocity. The lift curves of all the cases studied are plotted. The results show that the secondary blowing helps to control flow separation and cause an increase in the lift and delay the stalling of airfoils in both cases. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:边界层在翼型上分离导致大的能量损失和强不利的压力梯度。这反过来导致提升力的减少和拖曳力的增加。因此,延迟或可能,消除流动分离是强制性的。消除流动分离将允许对许多实际应用的攻击程度较高。发现翼型的吸入侧稳定吹侧面在控制边界层分离方面是有效的。在本研究中分析NACA0012和LA203A翼型的流动,二次吹送喷射的位置为60%的弦长和角度为LA203a的NaCA0012和2至20度的攻击角度。二次吹风速度从自由流速度的0%到40%变化。研究的所有案例的升力曲线被绘制。结果表明,二次吹塑有助于控制流动分离并导致升力增加并延迟两种情况下翼型的放置。 (c)2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号