首页> 外文期刊>Acta odontologica Scandinavica. >Efficacy of ceramic repair material on the bond strength of composite resin to zirconia ceramic
【24h】

Efficacy of ceramic repair material on the bond strength of composite resin to zirconia ceramic

机译:陶瓷修补材料对复合树脂与氧化锆陶瓷结合强度的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective. The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of composite resin in five different repair systems. Materials and methods. Sixty specimens (7 mm in diameter and 3 mm in height) of zirconia ceramic were fabricated. All specimen surfaces were prepared with a 30 mm fine diamond rotary cutting instrument with water irrigation for 10 s and dried with oil-free air. Specimens were then randomly divided into six groups for the following different intra-oral repair systems (n = 10): Group 1, control group; Group 2, Cojet system (3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany); Group 3, Cimara (R) System (Voco, Cuxhaven, Germany); Group 4, Z-Prime Plus System (Bisco Inc., Schaumburg, IL); Group 5, Clearfil (TM) System (Kuraray, Osaka, Japan); and Group 6, Z-Bond System (Danville, CA). After surface conditioning, a composite resin Grandio (Voco, Cuxhaven, Germany) was applied to the zirconia surface using a cylindrical mold (5 mm in diameter and 3 mm in length) and incrementally filled up, according to the manufacturer's instructions of each intra-oral system. Each specimen was subjected to a shear load at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min until fracture. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey post-hoc tests were used to analyze the bond strength values. Results. There were significant differences between Groups 2-6 and Group 1. The highest bond strength values were obtained with Group 2 (17.26 +/- 3.22) and Group 3 (17.31 +/- 3.62), while the lowest values were observed with Group 1 (8.96 +/- 1.62) and Group 6 (12.85 +/- 3.95). Conclusion. All repair systems tested increased the bond strength values between zirconia and composite resin that used surface grinding with a diamond bur.
机译:目的。这项研究的目的是评估五种不同修复体系中复合树脂的剪切粘结强度。材料和方法。制作了60个氧化锆陶瓷样品(直径7毫米,高3毫米)。所有样品表面均使用30毫米细金刚石旋转切割仪进行水冲洗10秒钟,并用无油空气干燥。然后将样本随机分为六组,用于以下不同的口腔内修复系统(n = 10):第一组,对照组;第2组,Cojet系统(3M ESPE,德国塞费尔德); Cimara(R)系统第3组(德国库克斯港的Voco);第4组,Z-Prime Plus系统(伊利诺伊州绍姆堡,Bisco Inc.);第5组,Clearfil(TM)系统(日本大阪可乐丽);和第6组,Z-Bond系统(加利福尼亚州丹维尔)。表面处理后,按照制造商的指示,将复合树脂Grandio(Voco,德国库克斯港,德国)使用圆柱形模具(直径5 mm,长度3 mm)施加到氧化锆表面上,并逐渐填充。口腔系统。每个样品以1mm / min的十字头速度经受剪切载荷直至断裂。使用单向方差分析(ANOVA)和Tukey事后检验来分析粘结强度值。结果。第2-6组与第1组之间存在显着差异。第2组(17.26 +/- 3.22)和第3组(17.31 +/- 3.62)获得了最高的粘合强度值,而第1组则获得了最低的结合强度值。 (8.96 +/- 1.62)和第6组(12.85 +/- 3.95)。结论。所有测试的修复系统均提高了氧化锆与复合材料树脂之间的结合强度值,该复合树脂使用了金刚石钻头进行表面研磨。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号