首页> 外文期刊>Computers and Electronics in Agriculture >Exploring management strategies to improve maize yield and nitrogen use efficiency in northeast China using the DNDC and DSSAT models
【24h】

Exploring management strategies to improve maize yield and nitrogen use efficiency in northeast China using the DNDC and DSSAT models

机译:利用DNDC和DSSAT模型探索玉米产量和氮气利用效率提高玉米产量和氮气利用效率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Process-based models are valuable tools for simulating crop production, estimating agronomic efficiency and developing optimum management practices to achieve sustainable agriculture. However, a comparison of the DeNitrification-DeComposition (DNDC) and Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT) models has not been previously used to optimize management practices for spring maize in northeast China. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the performance of the DSSAT and DNDC models in simulating maize growth and soil C & N dynamics and analyse their weaknesses and strengths based on a 7-year spring maize study in northeast China; and to explore the optimal management practices for improving maize production and nitrogen use efficiency under 20-year climate variability. Both DNDC and DSSAT exhibited "good" to "excellent" performance in simulating maize yield, above-ground biomass and plant N uptake for ecological intensification with N fertilizer (EI-N) and farmers' practice with N fertilizer (FP-N) treatments based on percent bias (PBIAS) of - 10.5-4.2%, a normalized root mean squared error (nRMSE) of 7.5-17.2%, a Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) of 0.17-0.77 and a d index of agreement (d) of 0.81-0.94. Both models showed "fair" to "good" performance in the same simulation for EI without N fertilizer (EI-NO) and FP without N fertilizer (FP-NO) treatments, but the maize yield simulation was better for the DSSAT model. In addition, the two models provided "fair" performance for N-fertilized treatments to "poor" performance for N-unfertilized treatments in simulations of soil organic carbon (0-0.20 m) and mineral N (0-0.30 m), but the simulations were better for the DNDC model. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the optimum yield and agronomic efficiency were achieved at a planting date of late April to early May, a fertilizer N application rate of 180-210 kg N ha(-1) with two timing splits in the DNDC and DSSAT model and a planting density of 7 seeds m(-2) in the DSSAT model. This study suggests that comparing the management scenarios of multiple dynamic models is more beneficial to develop best management practices for improving crop production and fertilizer use efficiency.
机译:基于过程的模型是模拟作物生产的有价值的工具,估算农艺效率以及开发最佳管理实践,以实现可持续农业。然而,反硝化分解(DNDC)和用于农业技术转移(DSSAT)模型的决策支持系统的比较尚未以前用于优化东北春玉米的管理实践。本研究的目标是评估DSSAT和DNDC模型在模拟玉米生长和土壤C&N动力学中的性能,并根据东北东北7年的春季玉米研究分析其弱点和优势;并探讨20年气候变化下改善玉米生产和氮利用效率的最佳管理实践。 DNDC和DSSAT两者都表现出“良好”的“优异的”性能,在模拟玉米产量,地上生物量和植物N吸收,用于使用N肥(FP-N)治疗的生态强化生态强化进行生态强化基于偏见(PBIAS)的百分比 - 10.5-4.2%,归一化的根均匀误差(NRMSE)为7.5-17.2%,NASH-SUTCLIFFE效率(NSE)为0.17-0.77和AD协议指数(D) 0.81-0.94。两种模型在没有N肥(EI-NO)和FP的同一模拟中,在没有N肥(FP-NO)治疗的情况下,两种模型在同一模拟中显示出“良好”的性能,但玉米产量模拟对于DSSAT模型更好。此外,两种模型为N-施肥治疗的“公平”性能提供了“差”性能,对土壤有机碳(0-0.20米)和矿物N(0-0.30米)的模拟中的N-未受精处理。 DNDC模型的模拟更好。敏感性分析表明,4月下旬至5月早期的种植日,180-210千克(-1)的施肥率在DNDC和DSSAT模型中具有两个时序分裂DSSAT模型中7种种子M(-2)的种植密度。本研究表明,比较多种动态模型的管理场景更有利于开发最佳管理实践,以改善作物生产和肥料利用效率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号