...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical & translational oncology : >Impact of diabetes comorbidity on the efficacy and safety of FOLFOX first-line chemotherapy among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis of two phase-III studies
【24h】

Impact of diabetes comorbidity on the efficacy and safety of FOLFOX first-line chemotherapy among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis of two phase-III studies

机译:糖尿病合并率对转移结直肠癌患者Folfox第一线化疗的疗效和安全性:两期 - III研究的合并分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BackgroundThe current analysis aims to provide an evaluation of the impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) on the efficacy and safety of first-line FOLFOX chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).MethodsThis is a pooled analysis of the comparator arms of two clinical trials (NCT00272051; NCT00305188) which evaluated first-line FOLFOX chemotherapy for patients with mCRC. The overall survival and progression-free survival according to patient subsets (non-diabetic and diabetic patients) were assessed through Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank testing. Propensity score matching was additionally conducted to account for heterogeneity in baseline characteristics of different subsets of patients.ResultsA total of 756 patients were enrolled in the current analysis; of which 64 patients have pre-existing DM while 692 patients were non-diabetic. Through Kaplan-Meier analysis, no evidence for overall or progression-free survival difference was found among the two patient subsets (P=0.501; P=0.960, respectively). Moreover, metformin treatment does not affect overall or progression-free survival among diabetic patients (P=0.598; P=0.748, respectively). Repetition of overall and progression-free survival assessment following propensity score matching does not reveal any differences. Comparing diabetic to non-diabetic patients, there were no differences between the two groups in terms of acute oxaliplatin-induced neurological symptoms including cold-induced dysthesia (P=0.600), laryngeal dysthesia (P=0.707), jaw pain (P=0.743) or muscle pain (P=0.506). Moreover, no difference was seen between the two groups in terms of the incidence of long-term oxaliplatin-induced paresthesia (P=0.107), highest grade of paresthesia (P=0.498) or rates of recovery from paresthesia (P=0.268). Diabetic patients have, however, a shorter time to develop oxaliplatin-induced paresthesia (P=0.024).ConclusionDM does not seem to affect overall or progression-free survival of mCRC patients treated with first-line FOLFOX chemotherapy. Moreover, DM does not influence the incidence or severity of oxaliplatin-induced paresthesia in those patients while it might lead to a shorter time to develop oxaliplatin-induced paresthesia compared to non-diabetic patients.
机译:背景技术目前的分析旨在评估糖尿病(DM)对转移结直肠癌患者的一线Folfox化学疗法的影响(MCRC)的疗效和安全性评估.Methodsthis是两个临床的比较器臂的汇总分析试验(NCT00272051; NCT00305188),其评估了MCRC患者的一线Folfox化疗。根据Kaplan-Meier分析和对数级测试评估根据患者亚群(非糖尿病和糖尿病患者)的整体存活和无进展生存。另外进行倾向得分匹配以考虑不同患者的基线特征的异质性。评估当前分析中的756名患者的总共756名患者;其中64名患者预先存在DM,而692名患者是非糖尿病。通过Kaplan-Meier分析,两名患者子集中没有发现总体或无进展的存活差异(P = 0.501; P = 0.960)。此外,二甲双胍治疗不会影响糖尿病患者(P = 0.598; P = 0.748)之间的总体或无进展的存活率。在倾向分数匹配后,重复总体和无进展的存活评估并没有揭示任何差异。将糖尿病与非糖尿病患者进行比较,两组在急性奥沙利铂诱导的神经系统症状方面没有差异,包括冷诱导的患病(P = 0.600),喉压(P = 0.707),下颚疼痛(P = 0.743 )或肌肉疼痛(p = 0.506)。此外,在长期欧洲铂诱导的感觉率(P = 0.107)的发生率,两组之间没有差异在两组之间(p = 0.107),热敏级别(P = 0.498)或来自感扰的恢复率(p = 0.268)。然而,糖尿病患者有较短的时间开发奥沙利铂诱导的感觉(p = 0.024).Conclusiondm似乎没有影响用一线Folfox化疗治疗的MCRC患者的总体或无进展生存。此外,DM不会影响那些患者在那些患者中的奥沙利​​铂诱导的感觉的发病率或严重程度,而与非糖尿病患者相比,它可能导致开发奥沙利铂诱导的热敏的时间较短。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号