首页> 外文期刊>Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. >Simple end-to-end suture versus augmented repair in acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a retrospective comparison in 98 patients.
【24h】

Simple end-to-end suture versus augmented repair in acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a retrospective comparison in 98 patients.

机译:急性跟腱断裂简单的端到端缝合与强化修复:98例患者的回顾性比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We retrospectively compared the results in 98 patients with an acute Achilles tendon rupture treated with an augmented tendon repair (n = 59) to patients with an end-to-end suture (n = 39) after an average follow-up of 44 (22-69) months. 7 patients were operated on more than 2 weeks after the rupture, all with augmention. The complication rates in the augmention group were 0.1 and in the end-to-end suture group 0.2. We found no differences in subjective outcome or rerupture rate between the groups. In the augmentation group, the rate of complications was higher in those operated on after 2 weeks than in those operated on before. A simple end-to-end suture seems sufficient.
机译:我们对平均随访44例(22例)的98例急性跟腱断裂经强化肌腱修复治疗的患者(n = 59)与采用端对端缝线缝合(n = 39)的患者进行了比较。 -69)个月。 7例患者在破裂后超过2周接受了手术,全部都进行了增强。扩大组的并发症发生率为0.1,端到端缝合组的并发症发生率为0.2。我们发现两组之间主观结果或复发率无差异。在扩大组中,术后2周的并发症的发生率高于之前进行的手术。一条简单的端到端缝线就足够了。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号