...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and experimental hypertension: CEH >Acute glycemic and pressure responses of continuous and interval aerobic exercise in patients with type 2 diabetes
【24h】

Acute glycemic and pressure responses of continuous and interval aerobic exercise in patients with type 2 diabetes

机译:2型糖尿病患者连续和间隔有氧运动的急性血糖和压力响应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

ABSTRACT, Background: Aerobic training has been widely indicated to patients with type 2 diabetes. However, there are still few studies comparing acute glycemic and blood pressure effects of different methods of aerobic training. The aim is to compare glycemic and pressure acute responses of continuous aerobic exercise to interval aerobic exercise in patients with type 2 diabetes. Materials and Methods: This study is a randomized, crossover clinical trial. Fourteen patients with type 2 diabetes performed two sessions of aerobic training with different methods (continuous and interval). Continuous session had duration of 35 minutes with intensity of 85-90% of heart rate corresponding to anaerobic threshold (HRAT), while interval session had 45 minutes, with stimulus in intensity of 85-90% of HRAT with recovery in intensity under 85% of HRAT. Capillary glycemia, systolic and diastolic blood pressure were analyzed before and after the sessions. Results: Patients were 63.5 ± 9.8 years old. Glycemia was reduced in both sessions (p < 0.001). Only glycemia measured at 25 minutes after continuous session was not lower than pre-session values. Systolic blood pressure was also reduced in both sessions (p = 0.010) with similar behavior between them. In the diastolic blood pressure, there were differences only between the values measured immediately after exercise and the values measured 20 minutes (p = 0.002) and 30 minutes after exercise (p = 0.008). Conclusion: Both continuous and interval aerobic exercise, in a same intensity, are effective for glycemic and pressure acute reductions in individuals with type 2 diabetes. For patients with greater risk of hypertension, we believe that the interval method is safer.
机译:摘要,背景:有氧训练已被广泛向2型糖尿病患者表明。然而,仍有几种研究比较了不同的好氧训练方法的急性血糖和血压效应。目的是将连续有氧运动的血糖和压力急性反应进行比较,以2型糖尿病患者的间隔有氧运动。材料和方法:本研究是一种随机的交叉临床试验。 2型糖尿病患者用不同方法进行了两次有氧训练(连续和间隔)。连续会议的持续时间为35分钟,强度为85-90%的心率,对应于厌氧阈值(HRAT),而间间期有45分钟,强度为85-90%的刺激,强度恢复为85% Hrat。在会话之前和之后分析了毛细血管糖血症,收缩系和舒张血压。结果:患者63.5±9.8岁。两次会话减少了糖血症(P <0.001)。仅在连续会议后25分钟测量的糖血症不低于会话前值。两次会话(P = 0.010)也减少了收缩压,它们之间的行为相似。在舒张压血压中,仅在运动后立即测量的值之间存在差异,并且在运动后测量20分钟(p = 0.002)和30分钟(p = 0.008)之间的值。结论:连续和间隔的有氧运动,以相同的强度,对患有2型糖尿病的个体血糖和压力急性减少有效。对于高血压风险更大的患者,我们认为间隔方法更安全。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号