...
首页> 外文期刊>Communications in Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences >Comparison of different Digestate Processing Systems Concerning environmental Efficiency
【24h】

Comparison of different Digestate Processing Systems Concerning environmental Efficiency

机译:关于环境效率的不同消化处理系统的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

There are regions in Europe with high livestock density, which means high quantities of manure with organic nutrients but insufficient areas to applicate these nutrient amounts. On the other side, there are large areas with a high nutrient demand forplant cultivation. There are several options to treat manure with the aim of saving emissions and solve transport distance problems simultaneously. This assessment will make a contribution towards further optimization of manure treatment systems with focus on climate change, eutrophication and acidification potential. The conducted life cycle assessment shows that manure treatment is not better than conventional manure handling in any case. From an overall ecological view treatment, options that separate manure or digested manure with downstream composting can be an optimal way of manure treatment. Further positive aspects are the increase of transport distances in consequence of composting or drying processes.
机译:欧洲有高牲畜密度的地区,这意味着具有有机营养素的大量粪便,但面积不足,以吸引这些营养量。 在另一边,有很大的营养需求培养培养。 有几种选择粪便,目的是同时节省排放并解决运输距离问题。 该评估将对粪便治疗系统进行进一步优化,重点是气候变化,富营养化和酸化潜力。 进行的生命周期评估表明,粪便治疗在任何情况下都不优于常规粪便处理。 从整体生态视图治疗中,单独粪肥或消化肥料与下游堆肥的选择可以是粪便治疗的最佳方式。 进一步的阳性方面是随着堆肥或干燥过程的后续传输距离的增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号