首页> 外文期刊>Clinical oral investigations >Evaluation of polymerization shrinkage of bulk-fill resin composites using microcomputed tomography
【24h】

Evaluation of polymerization shrinkage of bulk-fill resin composites using microcomputed tomography

机译:用微型断层扫描评价块状填充树脂复合材料的聚合收缩

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives This study evaluated the influence of cavity depth on polymerization shrinkage of bulk-fill resin composites with and without adhesive resin. Materials and methods Standardized box-shaped cavities (width, 4 mm; length, 5 mm, depth, 2 mm or 4 mm) were made on occlusal surfaces of extracted human third molars (N = 60). The teeth were assigned to 3 groups to receive bulk-fill resin composites (low-viscosity bulk-fill, SDR; high-viscosity bulk-fill; Filtek Bulk-Fill-FB; and TetricEvo Ceram Bulk-Fill-TB) in the prepared cavities with and without adhesive resin (Clearfil S3 Bond). Each specimen (n = 5 per group) was scanned twice using microcomputed tomography (micro-CT): once after application of the resin composite to the cavity prior to polymerisation and once after polymerisation. The shrinkage of volumetric loss (%) was measured using micro-CT. Data were analysed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests (alpha = 0.05). Results The material type (p < 0.05), application of adhesive resin (p < 0.05) and cavity depth (p < 0.05) significantly affected the shrinkage values. The interaction terms were also significant (p < 0.05). All the bulk-fill resin composites tested showed significantly less shrinkage when applied in cavities with adhesive resin (0.94-2.55) compared with those without (2.01-3.45) (p < 0.05) and presented significantly more shrinkage after polymerisation (p < 0.05). At a 2-mm cavity depth without (2 mm, 2.28; 4 mm, 2.41) and with adhesive (2 mm, 0.94; 4 mm, 1.67), significantly less shrinkage was observed with FB compared with SDR and TB (p < 0.05). At a 4-mm cavity depth without (3.14) and with adhesive (2.55), SDR showed significantly higher shrinkage compared with FB and TB (p < 0.05). Conclusions The bulk-fill composites tested presented less shrinkage when used in conjunction with adhesive resin application on dentin. Overall, the low-viscosity bulk-fill resin SDR showed more shrinkage compared with high-viscosity resins tested.
机译:目的本研究评估了腔深度对具有粘合树脂和不具有粘性树脂的块填充树脂复合材料的聚合收缩的影响。在提取的人第三磨牙的咬合表面上,对材料和方法标准化箱形空腔(宽度,4mm;长度,5mm,深度,2mm或4mm)制成,对咬合表面(n = 60)。将牙齿分配给3组以接收堆积填充树脂复合材料(低粘度堆积,SDR;高粘度散装; Filtek Bulk-Fill-FB;和Tetricevo Ceram Bulk-Fill-TB)中制备的具有和无粘性树脂的空腔(ClearFil S3键)。使用微型断层扫描(Micro-CT)扫描每种样品(每组N = 5):在聚合前施加树脂复合物到腔中,聚合后一次施用一次。使用微型CT测量体积损失(%)的收缩。使用Kruskal-Wallis和Mann-Whitney U测试进行分析数据(alpha = 0.05)。结果材料型(P <0.05),粘性树脂的施用(P <0.05)和腔深(P <0.05)显着影响收缩值。相互作用术语也很显着(P <0.05)。与没有(2.01-3.45)的粘合剂树脂(0.94-2.55)的空腔中施用时,测试的所有块状填充树脂复合材料显示出明显更少的收缩率(P <0.05)(P <0.05),并在聚合后呈现显着更长的收缩(P <0.05) 。在2毫米的腔体深度(2mm,2.28; 4 mm,2.41)和粘合剂(2mm,0.94; 4mm,1.67),与SDR和Tb相比,使用FB观察到显着更少的收缩(P <0.05 )。在没有(3.14)和粘合剂(2.55)的4毫米腔深度下,与FB和Tb相比,SDR显示出明显更高的收缩(P <0.05)。结论当与牙本质上的粘合树脂应用结合使用时,测试的块状填充复合材料呈现较少的收缩。总的来说,与测试的高粘度树脂相比,低粘度散装树脂SDR显示出更多收缩。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号