...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Endocrinology >Outcomes of Bethesda categories III III and IV IV thyroid nodules over 5?years and performance of the Afirma gene expression classifier: A single‐institution study
【24h】

Outcomes of Bethesda categories III III and IV IV thyroid nodules over 5?years and performance of the Afirma gene expression classifier: A single‐institution study

机译:Bethesda类别III III和IV IV甲状腺结节的结果超过5?年和AFIRMA基因表达式分类器的性能:单一机构研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Summary Objective The second edition Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytology estimates 6%‐18% malignancy rate of category III (B3) and 10%‐40% for category IV (B4) nodules; however, reported malignancy rates have considerable variability among institutions. Use of molecular classifiers (including Afirma Gene Expression Classifier, GEC ) can be utilized in management of thyroid nodules. Our objective was to analyse malignancy rates of B3 and B4 nodules and determine clinical outcomes of GEC Benign nodules. Methods A retrospective analysis of 2019 thyroid FNA s was performed at the University of Colorado from 2011 to 2015, including molecular, surgical and clinical follow‐up. Results Of 2019 FNA s analysed, 231 (11.4%) were diagnosed as B3 and 80 (4.0%) as B4. GEC was obtained in 54.1% of B3 cases, with nearly half (48.8%) having a Benign result. Surgery was performed in 40.7% B3 cases with a 24.5% malignancy rate, ranging 8%‐38% by year. In the B4 group, 52.5% underwent molecular testing with 28.6% as GEC Benign. About 68.8% of B4 cases underwent surgery with a 20% malignancy rate, ranging 0%‐42% by year. Seventy‐three GEC Benign cases were reviewed: 5 (6.8%) underwent surgery, with none demonstrating malignancy in the target nodule. Size remained stable for most GEC Benign nodules: 75.9% (B3) and 71.4% (B4) with no malignancy on repeat FNA . Conclusions Our 5‐year review demonstrated that malignancy rates of B3 and B4 nodules showed year‐to‐year variability. We suggest that clinicians use a multi‐year average of their institution's malignancy rates to optimally manage patients. Follow‐up for GEC Benign cases thus far supports their indolent nature.
机译:摘要目标报告甲状腺细胞学的第二版Bethesda系统估计III类(B3)的6%-18%恶性率和IV类别(B4)结节的10%-40%;然而,报告的恶性利率在机构之间具有相当大的变化。可以使用分子分类剂(包括Afirma基因表达分类剂,GEC)的甲状腺结节的管理。我们的目的是分析B3和B4结节的恶性率,并确定GEC良性结节的临床结果。方法从2011年到2015年在科罗拉多大学进行2019年甲状腺FNA S的回顾性分析,包括分子,外科和临床随访。分析2019年FNA S的结果,231(11.4%)被诊断为B3和80(4.0%)作为B4。 GEC在54.1%的B3病例中获得,近一半(48.8%)具有良性结果。手术在40.7%的B3患者中进行,恶性率为24.5%,逐年的8%-38%。在B4组中,52.5%的分子检测分子检测为GEC良性。大约68.8%的B4病例接受手术,恶性率为20%,逐年距离0%-42%。综述了七十三个GEC良性病例:5(6.8%)接受手术,无证明目标结节中的恶性肿瘤。大多数GEC良性结节均为稳定:75.9%(B3)和71.4%(B4),对重复FNA没有恶性肿瘤。结论我们的5年综述表明,B3和B4结节的恶性率表现为年份变化。我们建议临床医生使用其机构的多年平均的恶性率来最佳地管理患者。迄今为止GEC良性案件的随访支持他们的惰性性质。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号