首页> 外文期刊>Clinical EEG and neuroscience: official journal of the EEG and Clinical Neuroscience Society (ENCS) >Does Valproic Acid/Na Valproate Suppress Auditory Startle Reflex in Patients With Epilepsy?
【24h】

Does Valproic Acid/Na Valproate Suppress Auditory Startle Reflex in Patients With Epilepsy?

机译:丙戊酸/纳丙醛抑制癫痫患者的听觉惊吓反射吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and Objective. Auditory startle response (ASR) was normal in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy whereas it was suppressed in progressive myoclonic epilepsy. However, both groups were using valproic acid/Na valproate (VPA) in different doses. Therefore, we aimed to analyze whether VPA has an impact on ASR in a cohort of epilepsy. For this purpose, we included patients with epilepsy and analyzed ASR in patients who were using VPA. Patients and Method. We included 51 consecutive patients who had epilepsy and were using VPA between January 2014 and January 2016. Two control groups of 37 epilepsy patients using other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and of 25 healthy subjects were also constituted. All participants underwent investigations of ASR and startle response to somatosensory inputs (SSS) under similar conditions. Results. An analysis of patients using VPA, not using VPA and healthy subjects revealed significantly longer latency and lower probability of orbicularis oculi (O.oc) and sternocleidomastoid responses after auditory stimulation, decreased total ASR probability and longer latency of O.oc response after somatosensory stimulation in patient groups compared with healthy subjects. Multivariate analysis showed type of AED had a role in the generation of abnormalities. VPA, carbamazepine, and multiple AED use caused suppression of ASR. Total ASR probability was decreased or O.oc latency got longer with longer duration of VPA use whereas serum VPA level at the time of investigation did not correlate with total ASR probability. Discussion. Both ASR and SSS are suppressed by the effect of VPA, especially in patients using for a long period and in patients using other AEDs with VPA. Given the fact that VPA leads to long-standing synaptic changes of dopaminergic transmission, abnormalities of this network may be the more likely cause.
机译:背景和目标。听觉惊吓响应(ASR)在幼年肌阵挛性癫痫中正常是正常的,而它被抑制在渐进式肌阵挛性癫痫中。然而,两组在不同剂量中使用丙戊酸/ Na戊酸(VPA)。因此,我们旨在分析VPA是否对癫痫队的群体对ASR产生影响。为此目的,我们包括癫痫患者,并分析了使用VPA的患者的ASR。患者和方法。我们包括癫痫患者的51名患者,2014年1月和2016年1月在2016年1月之间使用VPA .27种癫痫药物使用其他抗癫痫药物(AEDs)和25名健康受试者的两种对照组。所有参与者在类似条件下接受了对SOMATOSENTORY INPUTS(SSS)的ASR和惊吓响应的调查。结果。使用VPA的患者分析,不使用VPA和健康受试者揭示了听觉刺激后腹膜肌肉(O.o​​c)和胸骨细胞肌瘤反应的显着更长的延迟和较低概率,降低了躯体感应刺激后O.oc反应的总ASR概率和更长潜伏期与健康受试者相比,患者群体。多变量分析显示AED类型在异常的产生中具有作用。 VPA,卡马西平和多次AED使用导致ASR的抑制。 ASR总概率降低或o.oc延迟随着VPA的持续时间较长而较长,而调查时的血清VPA水平与总ASR概率没有相关。讨论。 ASR和SSS都被VPA的效果抑制了VPA,特别是在患者使用长期和患者使用其他AEDs的患者进行VPA。鉴于VPA导致多巴胺能传输的长期突触变化,该网络的异常可能是更可能的原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号