首页> 外文期刊>Clinical rehabilitation >The clinical- and cost-effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation and ankle-foot orthoses for foot drop in Multiple Sclerosis: a multicentre randomized trial
【24h】

The clinical- and cost-effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation and ankle-foot orthoses for foot drop in Multiple Sclerosis: a multicentre randomized trial

机译:功能电刺激和踝足矫正效果的临床 - 和成本效益,用于多种硬化症中的脚下降:多期式随机试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To compare the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) and functional electrical stimulation (FES) over 12 months in people with Multiple Sclerosis with foot drop. Design: Multicentre, powered, non-blinded, randomized trial. Setting: Seven Multiple Sclerosis outpatient centres across Scotland. Subjects: Eighty-five treatment-naive people with Multiple Sclerosis with persistent (>three months) foot drop. Interventions: Participants randomized to receive a custom-made, AFO (n = 43) or FES device (n = 42). Outcome measures: Assessed at 0, 3, 6 and 12 months; 5-minute self-selected walk test (primary), Timed 25 Foot Walk, oxygen cost of walking, Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29, Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12, Modified Fatigue Impact Scale, Euroqol five-dimension five-level questionnaire, Activities-specific Balance and Confidence Scale, Psychological Impact of Assistive Devices Score, and equipment and National Health Service staff time costs of interventions. Results: Groups were similar for age (AFO, 51.4 (11.2); FES, 50.4(10.4) years) and baseline walking speed (AFO, 0.62 (0.21); FES 0.73 (0.27) m/s). In all, 38% dropped out by 12 months (AFO, n = 21; FES, n = 11). Both groups walked faster at 12 months with device (P < 0.001; AFO, 0.73 (0.24); FES, 0.79 (0.24) m/s) but no difference between groups. Significantly higher Psychological Impact of Assistive Devices Scores were found for FES for Competence (P = 0.016; AFO, 0.85(1.05); FES, 1.53(1.05)), Adaptability (P = 0.001; AFO, 0.38(0.97); FES 1.53 (0.98)) and Self-Esteem (P = 0.006; AFO, 0.45 (0.67); FES 1 (0.68)). Effects were comparable for other measures. FES may offer value for money alternative to usual care. Conclusion: AFOs and FES have comparable effects on walking performance and patient-reported outcomes; however, high drop-outs introduces uncertainty.
机译:目的:比较踝足偏离(AFOS)和功能电刺激(FES)在具有脚下多发性硬化的人的临床和成本效果和功能电刺激(FES)。设计:多期,动力,非蒙蔽,随机试验。设置:苏格兰七个多发性硬化关门中心。主题:八十五名治疗 - 天真的人,多发性硬化,持续(>三个月)脚下降。干预措施:随机接收定制的AFO(n = 43)或FES设备(n = 42)的参与者。结果措施:评估为0,3,6和12个月; 5分钟自选步行试验(初级),定时25英尺走,氧气成本走路,多发性硬化冲击量表-29,多发性硬化行走量表-12,改良疲劳冲击量表,欧元季度五维五层次调查问卷,活动特定的平衡和置信范围,辅助设备的心理影响,以及设备和国家卫生服务人员的时间费用干预措施。结果:组年龄相似(AFO,51.4(11.2); FES,50.4(10.4)年和基线步行速度(AFO,0.62(0.21); FES 0.73(0.27)m / s)。总而言之,38%跌破12个月(AFO,N = 21; FES,N = 11)。两组在12个月内速度走得更快(P <0.001; AFO,0.73(0.24); FES,0.79(0.24)M / s),但组之间没有差异。对于能力的FES,发现辅助装置的心理影响显着提高了辅助装置的分数(P = 0.016; AFO,0.85(1.05); FES,1.53(1.05)),适应性(P = 0.001; AFO,0.38(0.97); FES 1.53(0.97); FES 1.53( 0.98))和自尊(P = 0.006; AFO,0.45(0.67); FES 1(0.68))。效果与其他措施相当。 FES可以为通常护理提供金钱替代品的价值。结论:AFOS和FES对行走性能和患者报告的结果具有相当的影响;然而,高辍学引入了不确定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号