...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical rehabilitation >Does adding case management to standard rehabilitation affect functional ability, pain, or the rate of return to work after lumbar spinal fusion? A randomized controlled trial with two-year follow-up
【24h】

Does adding case management to standard rehabilitation affect functional ability, pain, or the rate of return to work after lumbar spinal fusion? A randomized controlled trial with two-year follow-up

机译:是否将案例管理添加到标准康复影响功能能力,疼痛或腰椎脊柱融合后的返回工作率? 随机对照试验,两年随访

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To examine the effect of a case manager-assisted rehabilitation programme as an add-on to usual physical rehabilitation in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion. Design: A randomized controlled trial with a two-year follow-up. Settings: Outpatient clinics of a university hospital and a general hospital. Subjects: In total, 82 patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion. Interventions: The patients were randomized one-to-one to case manager-assisted rehabilitation (case manager group) or no case manager-assisted rehabilitation (control group). Both groups received usual physical rehabilitation. The case manager-assisted rehabilitation programme included a preoperative meeting with a case manager to determine a rehabilitation plan, postsurgical meetings, phone meetings, and voluntary workplace visits or roundtable meetings. Main measures: Primary outcome was the Oswestry Disability Index. Secondary outcomes were back pain, leg pain, and return to work. Results: Of the 41 patients in the case manager group, 49% were men, with the mean age of 46.1 (+/- 8.7 years). In the control group, 51% were male, with the mean age of 47.4 (+/- 8.9 years). No statistically significant between-group differences were found regarding any outcomes. An overall group effect of 4.1 points (95% confidence interval (CI): -1.8; 9.9) was found on the Oswestry Disability Index, favouring the control group. After two years, the relative risk of return to work was 1.18 (95% CI: 0.8; 1.7), favouring the case manager group. Conclusion: The case manager-assisted rehabilitation programme had no effect on the patients' functional disability or back and leg pain compared to usual physical rehabilitation. The study lacked power to evaluate the impact on return to work.
机译:目的:审查案例经理辅助康复计划的效果作为腰椎脊柱融合患者常用康复的联系。设计:随机对照试验,具有两年的随访。设置:大学医院的门诊诊所和综合医院。主题:总共有82名患者接受腰椎融合。干预措施:患者一对一的一对一,以案例经理辅助康复(案例经理组)或无案例经理辅助康复(对照组)。两组都接受了通常的身体康复。案例经理辅助康复计划包括审议会议,案例经理,以确定康复计划,后勤会议,电话会议和自愿工作场所访问或圆桌会议。主要措施:主要结果是oswestry残疾指数。二次结果是背部疼痛,腿部疼痛,并重返工作岗位。结果:41例案例经理组患者,49%是男性,平均年龄为46.1(+/- 8.7岁)。在对照组中,51%是男性,平均年龄为47.4(+/- 8.9岁)。没有发现关于任何结果的统计学意义。在Oswestry残疾指数上发现了4.1点(95%置信区间(CI):-1.8; 9.9)的总体群体效应,赞成对照组。两年后,返回工作的相对风险为1.18(95%CI:0.8; 1.7),有利于案件经理组。结论:案例经理辅助康复计划与通常的体质康复相比,对患者功能性残疾或后腿和腿部疼痛没有影响。该研究缺乏权力来评估对回归工作的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号