首页> 外文期刊>Clinical rehabilitation >Effect of adding interferential current stimulation to exercise on outcomes in primary care patients with chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Effect of adding interferential current stimulation to exercise on outcomes in primary care patients with chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled trial

机译:在慢性颈部疼痛初级护理患者术后加入干预电流刺激的影响:随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To evaluate the effect of adding interferential current stimulation to exercise on pain, disability, psychological status and range of motion in patients with neck pain. Design: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Setting: Primary care physiotherapy units. Subjects: A total of 84 patients diagnosed with non-specific mechanical neck pain. This sample was divided into two groups randomly: experimental (n = 42) versus control group (n = 42). Interventions: Patients in both groups had a supervised therapeutic exercise programme, with the experimental group having additional interferential current stimulation treatment. Main measures: The main measures used were intensity of neck pain according to the Visual Analogue Scale; the degree of disability according to the Neck Disability Index and the CORE Outcome Measure; anxiety and depression levels according to the Goldberg scale; apprehension as measured by the Personal Psychological Apprehension scale; and the range of motion of the cervical spine. The sample was evaluated at baseline and posttreatment (10 sessions/two weeks). Results: Statistically significant differences between groups at posttreatment were observed for Visual Analogue Scale (2.73 +/- 1.24 vs 4.99 +/- 1.56), Neck Disability Index scores (10.60 +/- 4.77 vs 18.45 +/- 9.04), CORE Outcome Measure scores (19.18 +/- 9.99 vs 35.12 +/- 13.36), Goldberg total score (6.17 +/- 4.27 vs 7.90 +/- 4.87), Goldberg Anxiety subscale, Personal Psychological Apprehension Scale scores (28.17 +/- 9.61 vs 26.29 +/- 11.14) and active and passive right rotation. Conclusions: Adding interferential current stimulation to exercise resulted in better immediate outcome across a range of measures.
机译:目的:评价颈部疼痛患者疼痛,残疾,心理地位和运动范围的运动,评价疗效刺激。设计:单一盲目的随机对照试验。设置:初级保健物理治疗单位。主题:共有84名患者被诊断出患有非特定机械颈部疼痛。将该样品随机分为两组:实验(n = 42)与对照组(n = 42)。干预措施:两组患者都有一个受监督的治疗运动计划,实验组具有额外的干涉电流刺激治疗。主要措施:根据视觉模拟量表使用的主要措施是颈部疼痛的强度;根据颈部残疾指数和核心结果测量的残疾程度;焦虑和抑郁水平根据Goldberg Scale;通过个人心理逮捕规模衡量的逮捕;以及颈椎的运动范围。该样品在基线和后处理(10个课程/两周)评估。结果:视觉模拟量表观察到后病毒组的统计学显着差异(2.73 +/- 1.24与4.99 +/- 1.56),颈部残疾指数分数(10.60 +/- 4.77 Vs 18.45 +/- 9.04),核心结果测量得分(19.18 +/- 9.99 VS 35.12 +/- 13.36),Goldberg总分(6.17 +/- 4.27 VS 7.90 +/- 4.87),Goldberg焦虑船只,个人心理逮捕尺度分数(28.17 +/- 9.61 vs 26.29 + / - 11.14)和主动和被动右旋。结论:增加锻炼的干涉电流刺激导致各种措施更好地立即结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号