...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical rehabilitation >A structured exercise programme combined with proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching or static stretching in posttraumatic stiffness of the elbow: a randomized controlled trial
【24h】

A structured exercise programme combined with proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching or static stretching in posttraumatic stiffness of the elbow: a randomized controlled trial

机译:结构化锻炼计划结合肘部故障刚度的妊娠纹或静态拉伸:随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objectives: To compare the different stretching techniques, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching and static stretching, in patients with elbow stiffness after a treated elbow fracture. Design: Randomized-controlled, single-blind study. Setting: Department of physiotherapy and rehabilitation. Subjects: Forty patients with posttraumatic elbow stiffness (24 women; mean age, 41.34 +/- 7.57 years). Intervention: PNF stretching group (n = 20), hold-relax PNF stretching combined with a structured exercise programme (two days per week for six weeks); static stretching group (n = 20), static stretching combined with a structured exercise programme (two days per week for six weeks). Main measures: The primary outcome is the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH). The secondary outcomes are active range of motion (AROM), visual analogue scale (VAS), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, Short Form-12 and Global Rating of Change. Participants were assessed at baseline, after a six-week intervention period and one-month later (follow-up). Results: After treatment, improvement in the mean DASH score was slightly better in the PNF stretching group (8.66 +/- 6.15) compared with the static stretching group (19.25 +/- 10.30) (p = 0.03). The overall group-by-time interaction for the 2 x 3 mixed-model analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was also significant for elbow flexion AROM (mean change for PNF stretching group; static stretching group; 41.10, 34.42, p = 0.04), VAS-rest (-1.31, -1.08, p = 0.03) and VAS-activity (-3.78, -3.47, p = 0.01) in favour of PNF stretching group. The other outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups. Conclusion: The study demonstrated that the structured exercise programme combined with PNF stretching might be effective in patients with posttraumatic elbow stiffness with regard to improving function, elbow flexion AROM, pain at rest and during activity.
机译:目标:比较治疗的肘部骨折后肘部刚度患者的不同拉伸技术,展示性神经肌肉促进(PNF)拉伸和静态拉伸。设计:随机控制,单盲研究。环境:物理治疗与康复部。受试者:40例患者急诊弯头僵硬(24名女性;平均年龄,41.34 +/- 7.57岁)。干预:PNF拉伸组(n = 20),保持放松PNF拉伸与结构化的运动程序(每周两天六周);静态拉伸组(n = 20),静态拉伸结合结构化的运动程序(每周两天六周)。主要措施:主要结果是手臂,肩部和手(跳线)的残疾。二次结果是运动(AROM),视觉模拟量表(VAS),坦帕恐怖,短型12的坦帕规模和变化等级等级的主动运动范围。在六周干预期和一个月后(随访)之后,在基线评估参与者。结果:与静态拉伸组(19.25 +/- 10.30)相比,PNF拉伸组(8.66 +/- 6.15)相比,PNF拉伸组(P = 0.03)中,在PNF拉伸组(8.66 +/- 6.15)中,平均损伤评分的改善略微好。用于2 x 3的协方差混合模型分析的总体逐时间相互作用对肘部屈曲AROM(PNF拉伸组的平均变化;静态拉伸组; 41.10,34.42,P = 0.04), VAS-静止(-1.31,-1.08,p = 0.03)和VAS-活性(-3.78,-3.47,p = 0.01),支持PNF拉伸组。两组之间的其他结果没有显着差异。结论:该研究表明,在改善功能,肘部屈曲突起,休息期间和活动期间,结构化运动计划与PNF拉伸的患者相结合的患者可能是有效的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号