...
首页> 外文期刊>Chemical Engineering Communications >CFD modeling and validation for two-phase medium viscosity oil-air flow in horizontal pipes
【24h】

CFD modeling and validation for two-phase medium viscosity oil-air flow in horizontal pipes

机译:水平管中两相中粘度油流量的CFD建模与验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study presents the results of a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulation of two-phase medium viscosity oil-air flow in a 50.8 mm internal diameter horizontal pipe. Void fraction and pressure gradient predictions were validated using experimental data for four different oil viscosities (0.039, 0.06, 0.108 and 0.166 Pa s) and different flow rates varying from 0.1 to 2.9 m/s for the gas phase and from 0.01 to 2.95 m/s for the liquid phase, where four flow patterns were predicted (stratified, dispersed bubble, bubble elongated and slug flow). The obtained results of void fraction and pressure gradient presented a mean relative error of 30.04 and 21.38%, respectively. Furthermore, the CFD results were compared against 66 empirical correlations and predictions from OLGA. It was found that between the three studied methods (CFD, OLGA and empirical correlations) the CFD model outperformed the other two methods regarding the predicted flow patterns, pressure gradients and void fractions on most cases.
机译:该研究介绍了50.8mm内径水平管中的两相浓度油流量的计算流体动力学(CFD)模拟。使用四种不同的油粘度(0.039,0.06,0.108和0.166Pa)的实验数据验证空隙分数和压力梯度预测,不同的流速从0.1-2.9m / s变化为气相,0.01至2.95米/对于液相,预测四个流动模式(分层,分散的气泡,气泡细长和裂隙流)。获得的空隙率和压力梯度的结果分别呈现30.04和21.38%的平均相对误差。此外,将CFD结果与OLGA的66个经验相关性和预测进行了比较。结果发现,在三种研究方法(CFD,OLGA和经验相关)之间,CFD模型在大多数情况下表现出关于预测的流动模式,压力梯度和空隙分数的其他两种方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号