首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Radiology: Journal of the Royal College of Radiologists >Assessment of automated cone-beam CT vessel identification software during transarterial hepatic embolisation: radiation dose, contrast medium volume, processing time, and operator perspectives compared to digital subtraction angiography
【24h】

Assessment of automated cone-beam CT vessel identification software during transarterial hepatic embolisation: radiation dose, contrast medium volume, processing time, and operator perspectives compared to digital subtraction angiography

机译:与数字减法血管造影相比,催化肝栓塞过程中自动肝孔CT血管识别软件的评估:辐射剂量,造影剂量,处理时间和操作员观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

AimTo evaluate arterial cone-beam computed tomography (A-CBCT) automated analysis software for identification of vessels supplying tumours during transarterial hepatic embolisation (TAE). Materials and methodsThis study was approved by the institutional review board, with waiver of consent. Consecutive TAE procedures using arterial mapping software (AMS), and performed between February 2014 and August 2014, were reviewed. Hepatic arteries were imaged using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as well as A-CBCT processed with AMS. Interventional radiologists reported1potential embolisation target vessels computed using AMS versus DSA alone,2modification of the embolisation plan based on AMS, and3operator confidence related to technical success. Imaging set-up, processing time, radiation dose, and contrast media volume were recorded. ResultsThirty of 34 consecutive procedures were evaluated retrospectively. At least one additional embolisation target vessel was identified using AMS in 13 procedures (43%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 26–61%) and embolisation plan modified in 11 (37%, 95% CI: 19–54%). Radiologists reported AMS increased operator confidence and reduced the number of DSA acquisitions in 25 (83%, 95% CI: 70–97%) and 15 cases (50%, 95% CI: 32–68%), respectively. The average A-CBCT acquisition and processing time was 4 minutes 53 seconds and 3 minutes 45 seconds, respectively. A-CBCT contributed to 11% of the radiation dose and 18% of the contrast media volume. ConclusionPhysicians report increased tumour supplying vessel detection and intraprocedural confidence using AMS during TAE without substantial impact on radiation dose, contrast media volume, and procedure time.
机译:AIMTO评估动脉锥梁计算断层扫描(A-CBCT)自动分析软件,用于静脉曲张肝脏栓塞(TAE)期间供应肿瘤的血管。材料和方法学习由机构审查委员会批准,并豁免同意。使用动脉映射软件(AMS)的连续TAE程序以及2014年2月和2014年8月在2014年间进行的。使用数字减法血管造影(DSA)以及用AMS加工的A-CBCT成像肝动脉。介入放射科医生报告了使用AMS与DSA计算的单一栓塞靶血管,基于AMS的舒收计划进行了2级,3流控与技术成功相关。记录了成像设置,处理时间,辐射剂量和对比度介质体积。回顾性评估了34个连续程序的结果。在13个方法中使用AMS鉴定至少一种另外的栓塞靶容器(43%,95%置信区间[CI]:26-61%)和改性栓塞计划(37%,95%CI:19-54%) 。辐射学家报告称,AMS增加了运营商的信心,并减少了25例(83%,95%:70-97%)和15例(50%,95%CI:32-68%)的DSA收购数量。平均A-CBCT采集和处理时间为4分53秒,分别为3分45秒。 A-CBCT导致辐射剂量的11%和造影剂量的18%。结论氏术人报告肿瘤供应血管检测和使用AMS在TAE期间的血管检测和颅脑置信,而不会对辐射剂量,造影剂量和程序时间进行大量影响。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Interventional Radiology Service Department of Radiology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center;

    Interventional Radiology Service Department of Radiology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center;

    GE Healthcare;

    Interventional Radiology Service Department of Radiology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center;

    Interventional Radiology Service Department of Radiology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center;

    Interventional Radiology Service Department of Radiology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center;

    Interventional Radiology Service Department of Radiology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 放射医学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-19 23:50:56

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号