首页> 外文期刊>Clinical nuclear medicine >Tc-99m-MIP-1404 SPECT/CT for Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability in Treatment-Related Longitudinal Tracer Uptake Assessments of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Positive Lesions
【24h】

Tc-99m-MIP-1404 SPECT/CT for Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability in Treatment-Related Longitudinal Tracer Uptake Assessments of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Positive Lesions

机译:TC-99M-MIP-1404 SPECT / CT用于转移前列腺癌的患者interobserver和intraobserver在治疗相关的纵向示踪剂的可变性,所述前列腺特异性膜抗原阳性病变的抗原阳性病变

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Tc-99m-MIP-1404 is a SPECT-suitable prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligand for detection of prostate cancer. In patients with metastatic prostate cancer, there are no data as yet on interobserver and intraobserver variability when assessing PSMA-positive lesions for longitudinal changes of tracer uptake. Methods Tc-99m-MIP-1404 SPECT/CT scans of 22 patients with metastatic prostate cancer were analyzed, and each subject was imaged at 2 separate points in time, before and after treatment. Mean interval between scans was 10 months. Three independent observers visually assessed a total of 96 PSMA-positive metastases (bone, 69; lymph node, 22; viscera, 3) or local recurrences (n = 2) for longitudinal changes in tracer uptake on planar scintigraphy and SPECT/CT. All lesions were categorized as regressive, stable, or progressive based on visual findings and on peak SUV (SUVpeak) of quantitative SPECT/CT (progressive, >30% SUVpeak increase; regressive, <30% SUVpeak decrease; or stable, all others). Results Quantitative analysis of PSMA-positive lesions yielded significantly higher interobserver agreement (90.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83%-0.96%) than visual assessments by either SPECT/CT (76.0%; 95% CI, 0.66%-0.84%) or planar scintigraphy (56.3%; 95% CI, 0.46%-0.66%). Intermethod comparison of aggregated results yielded significantly higher agreement between quantitative and visual SPECT/CT (85.1%; 95% CI, 0.80%-0.89%), as opposed to quantitative SPECT/CT and planar scintigraphy (53.1%; 95% CI, 0.47%-0.59%) or visual SPECT/CT and planar scintigraphy (54.9%; 95% CI, 0.49%-0.61%). In visual and quantitative analysis of 96 PSMA-positive lesions, the number of discrepancies ranged from 9 (9.4%) for quantitative SPECT/CT to 42 (43.8%) for planar scintigraphy. Overall reader confidence was higher for SPECT/CT than for planar scintigraphy (P < 0.001). Intraobserver agreement was near-perfect for all methods, whether SPECT/CT (visual, all kappa = 0.94-0.97; quantitative kappa = 0.94-0.98) or planar scintigraphy (all kappa = 0.90-0.94). Conclusions Quantitative evaluation of longitudinal change in tracer uptake by PSMA-positive lesions measured via SPECT/CT is superior to visual interpretation of images by planar scintigraphy or SPECT/CT. Compared with visual evaluation, quantitative SPECT/CT is highly reproducible, showing near-perfect agreement among observers and higher reader confidence.
机译:背景技术TC-99M-MIP-1404是用于检测前列腺癌的SPECT-合适的前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)配体。在转移性前列腺癌患者中,在评估样力摄取的纵向变化的PSMA阳性病变时,在Interobserver和Intraobserver变异上没有数据。方法分析22例转移性前列腺癌患者的TC-99M-MIP-1404 SPECT / CT扫描,并在治疗之前和之后在2个分开的时间内成像。扫描之间的平均间隔为10个月。三个独立观察员目视评估总共96个PSMA阳性转移(骨,69;淋巴结,22;内脏,3)或局部复发(n = 2),用于平面闪烁和SPECT / CT的示踪剂摄取的纵向变化。所有病变基于视觉调查结果和定量SPECT / CT的峰值SUV(SUVPEAK)(进行,> 30%SUVPEAK增加;回归,<30%SUVPEAK减少;或稳定,所有其他病变均被分类为渐变,稳定或渐进性; 。结果对PSMA阳性病变的定量分析产生明显更高的Interobserver协议(90.6%; 95%置信区间[CI],0.83%-0.96%)通过SPECT / CT(76.0%; 95%CI,0.66% - 0.84%)或平面闪烁图(56.3%; 95%CI,0.46%-0.66%)。聚集结果的间歇性比较,定量和视觉SPECT / CT之间的一致性显着更高(85.1%; 95%CI,0.80%-0.89%),而不是定量SPECT / CT和Planar Scintaphy(53.1%; 95%CI,0.47 %-0.59%)或视觉SPECT / CT和Paralar Scintaphy(54.9%; 95%CI,0.49%-0.61%)。在高96个Psma阳性病变的视觉和定量分析中,对于平面闪烁图的定量SPECT / CT至42(43.8%)的差异的数量范围为9(9.4%)。 SPECT / CT的整体读者信心比平坦的闪烁形状更高(P <0.001)。 intraobserver协议近乎完善所有方法,无论SPECT / CT(视觉,所有κ= 0.94-0.97;定量Kappa = 0.94-0.98)或Planar Scintigraphy(所有Kappa = 0.90-0.94)。结论通过SPECT / CT测量的PSMA阳性病变对示踪剂吸收纵向变化的定量评估优于平面闪烁或SPECT / CT的图像视觉解释。与视觉评估相比,定量SPECT / CT是高度可重复的,在观察者和更高的读者信心方面表现出近乎完美的一致性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号